Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 4955 Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, California 92507 USA;
Am J Bot. 2001 Feb;88(2):258-69.
The genetic background of transplants used to create or augment wild populations may affect the long-term success of restored populations. If seed sources are from differently adapted populations, then the relative performance of progeny from crosses among populations may decrease with an increase in genetic differences of parents and in the differences of parental environments to the transplant location. We evaluated the potential for such outbreeding depression by hybridizing individuals from six different populations of Lotus scoparius var. scoparius and L. s. var. brevialatus. We used allozyme data to calculate genetic distances between source populations, and compiled climatic data and measured soil traits to estimate environmental distances between source populations. We found significant outbreeding depression following controlled crosses. In the greenhouse, the success of crosses (seeds/flower × seedlings/seed) decreased with increasing genetic distance between populations revealing genetically based outbreeding depression unrelated to local adaptation. After outplanting to one native site (in situ common garden), field cumulative fitness of progeny (survival × fruit production) decreased significantly with mean environmental distance of the parental populations to the transplant site, but not with genetic distance between the crossed populations. This result is consistent with a disruption of local adaptation. At the second, ecologically contrasting common garden, where low survival reduced statistical power, field cumulative fitness (survival × progeny height) did not decrease significantly with either environmental distance or genetic distance. Overall, intervariety crosses were 40 and 50% as fit (seeds/flower × seedlings/seed × survival × fruits at the first garden or × height at the second) as intravariety crosses. These results suggest that the cumulative outbreeding depression was caused by a combination of genetically based ecological differences among populations and other genomic coadaptation. We conclude that mixing genetically differentiated seed sources of Lotus scoparius may significantly lower the fitness of augmented or restored populations. Genetic and environmental similarities of source populations relative to the transplant site should be considered when choosing source materials, a practice recommended by recent seed transfer policies. Geographic separation was not a good surrogate for either of these measures.
用于创建或增加野生种群的移植的遗传背景可能会影响恢复种群的长期成功。如果种子来源来自适应能力不同的种群,那么来自种群间杂交的后代的相对表现可能会随着父母遗传差异的增加以及与移植地点的父母环境差异的增加而降低。我们通过杂交来自 Lotus scoparius var. scoparius 和 L. s. var. brevialatus 的六个不同种群的个体来评估这种远缘杂交衰退的可能性。我们使用同工酶数据计算源种群之间的遗传距离,并编译气候数据并测量土壤特性以估计源种群之间的环境距离。我们发现受控杂交后存在显著的远缘杂交衰退。在温室中,随着种群间遗传距离的增加,杂交的成功率(花/种子×幼苗/种子)显著降低,表明存在与局部适应无关的基于遗传的远缘杂交衰退。在一个本地地点(原位普通花园)进行移植后,后代的田间累积适应度(存活×果实产量)与亲本种群与移植地点的平均环境距离显著相关,但与杂交种群之间的遗传距离无关。这一结果与局部适应的破坏一致。在第二个生态差异明显的普通花园中,由于低存活率降低了统计能力,田间累积适应度(存活×后代高度)与环境距离或遗传距离均无显著降低。总体而言,品种间杂交的适应度(第一个花园的花/种子×幼苗/种子×存活×果实或第二个花园的高度)比品种内杂交低 40%和 50%。这些结果表明,累积的远缘杂交衰退是由种群之间基于遗传的生态差异和其他基因组共适应的组合引起的。我们得出的结论是,混合 Lotus scoparius 的遗传分化的种子来源可能会显著降低增加或恢复种群的适应度。在选择源材料时,应考虑源种群相对于移植地点的遗传和环境相似性,这是最近的种子转移政策所建议的做法。地理分离不是这两个措施的良好替代品。