• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体患者数据荟萃分析中基线风险的预测模型与异质性

Predictive modeling and heterogeneity of baseline risk in meta-analysis of individual patient data.

作者信息

Trikalinos T A, Ioannidis J P

机构信息

Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):245-52. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00311-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00311-5
PMID:11223322
Abstract

We developed and evaluated methods for the analysis and interpretation of the baseline risk heterogeneity in meta-analysis of individual patient data (MIPD) based on information on predictive factors. We used data from a typical MIPD of eight clinical trials (1792 patients, 2947 years of follow-up) on the efficacy of high-dose acyclovir in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Cox models with four predictive factors (age, disease state, CD4 cell count and hemoglobin levels) were used to estimate predicted individual hazards both for single trials and for various MIPD modeling methods (simple pooling, adjusted for study, stratified per study, fixed and random effects for predictors). For each study and for each method of MIPD synthesis, we estimated the odds ratio for death in the upper versus the lower quartile of predicted risk (Extreme Quartile Odds Ratio, EQuOR) and the respective rate ratio (Extreme Quartile Rate Ratio, EQuRR). Only the CD4 cell count showed a significantly heterogeneous predictive effect across the eight studies (P =.024). The EQuOR of single studies ranged from 3.5 (little heterogeneity) to 24 (intermediate heterogeneity), substantially lower than the EQuOR of the MIPD (167 to 275, depending on the model used). The EQuRR values ranged from 3.5 to 77 for single studies and from 77 to 116 for the various MIPD models. Predictive modeling can be a major strength of MIPD, when performed and interpreted with standardized approaches. All models consistently show that MIPD may be a study design with extreme heterogeneity of patient baseline risk.

摘要

我们基于预测因素的信息,开发并评估了个体患者数据荟萃分析(MIPD)中基线风险异质性的分析和解释方法。我们使用了一项典型的MIPD数据,该数据来自八项关于高剂量阿昔洛韦治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒感染疗效的临床试验(1792例患者,2947人年的随访)。使用包含四个预测因素(年龄、疾病状态、CD4细胞计数和血红蛋白水平)的Cox模型来估计单个试验以及各种MIPD建模方法(简单合并、按研究调整、按研究分层、预测因素的固定效应和随机效应)下的个体预测风险。对于每项研究以及MIPD综合分析的每种方法,我们估计了预测风险上四分位数与下四分位数中死亡的比值比(极端四分位数比值比,EQuOR)和相应的率比(极端四分位数率比,EQuRR)。在八项研究中,只有CD4细胞计数显示出显著的异质性预测效应(P = 0.024)。单个研究的EQuOR范围为3.5(异质性小)至24(中等异质性),远低于MIPD的EQuOR(167至275,取决于所使用的模型)。单个研究的EQuRR值范围为3.5至77,各种MIPD模型的EQuRR值范围为77至116。当采用标准化方法进行和解释时,预测建模可能是MIPD的一个主要优势。所有模型一致表明,MIPD可能是一种患者基线风险存在极端异质性的研究设计。

相似文献

1
Predictive modeling and heterogeneity of baseline risk in meta-analysis of individual patient data.个体患者数据荟萃分析中基线风险的预测模型与异质性
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):245-52. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00311-5.
2
Heterogeneity of the baseline risk within patient populations of clinical trials: a proposed evaluation algorithm.临床试验患者群体中基线风险的异质性:一种提议的评估算法。
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Dec 1;148(11):1117-26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009590.
3
Recursive cumulative meta-analysis: a diagnostic for the evolution of total randomized evidence from group and individual patient data.递归累积荟萃分析:一种从分组数据和个体患者数据评估总体随机证据演变的诊断方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;52(4):281-91. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00159-0.
4
Practical methodology of meta-analysis of individual patient data using a survival outcome.使用生存结局进行个体患者数据荟萃分析的实用方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Mar;29(2):220-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
5
Clinical efficacy of high-dose acyclovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized individual patient data.大剂量阿昔洛韦治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者的临床疗效:一项随机个体患者数据的荟萃分析
J Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;178(2):349-59. doi: 10.1086/515621.
6
Predictive value of quantitative plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ lymphocyte count in HIV-infected infants and children.定量血浆HIV RNA和CD4 +淋巴细胞计数对HIV感染婴幼儿的预测价值。
JAMA. 1998 Mar 11;279(10):756-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.10.756.
7
Modelling progression of CD4-lymphocyte count and its relationship to survival time.CD4淋巴细胞计数的进展建模及其与生存时间的关系。
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1003-14.
8
The effect of the interaction of acyclovir with zidovudine on progression to AIDS and survival. Analysis of data in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study.阿昔洛韦与齐多夫定相互作用对艾滋病进展和生存的影响。多中心艾滋病队列研究数据分析。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jul 15;121(2):100-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-2-199407150-00004.
9
CD4+ guided antiretroviral treatment interruption in HIV infection: a meta-analysis.HIV感染中CD4+细胞指导下的抗逆转录病毒治疗中断:一项荟萃分析。
AIDS Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;10(4):236-44.
10
A semiparametric Bayesian approach to the random effects model.一种用于随机效应模型的半参数贝叶斯方法。
Biometrics. 1998 Sep;54(3):921-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Intravitreal Therapeutic Agents for Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.用于非感染性葡萄膜炎的新型玻璃体内治疗药物的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 5;13:749312. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.749312. eCollection 2022.
2
Immunotherapy Efficacy in the Initial Lines of Treatment in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review of the Literature.免疫疗法在晚期上消化道恶性肿瘤一线治疗中的疗效:文献系统评价。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Nov 16;5(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab088. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration.
预测治疗效果异质性的方法(PATH)声明:解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):W1-W25. doi: 10.7326/M18-3668. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析中的实际情况:方法学综述
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Dec;6(4):293-309. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1160. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
5
Efficacy and Safety of HER2-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer with HER2-Overexpression: A Network Meta-Analysis.HER2过表达乳腺癌的HER2靶向药物的疗效和安全性:一项网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0127404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127404. eCollection 2015.
6
Efficacy and toxicity of external-beam radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis.外照射治疗局限性前列腺癌的疗效和毒性:网络荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2014 May 13;110(10):2396-404. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.197. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
7
Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews.基于共识的系统评价中临床异质性研究的推荐意见。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Aug 30;13:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-106.
8
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.系统评价中临床异质性的研究:文献中指导方法的综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jul 30;12:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-111.
9
Meta-analysis in medical research.医学研究中的荟萃分析。
Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):29-37.
10
Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal.评估和报告临床试验中治疗效果的异质性:建议。
Trials. 2010 Aug 12;11:85. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-85.