• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安慰剂效应导致人类在药物辨别习得方面存在差异:一项回顾性分析。

Placebo-effects contribute to differences in the acquisition of drug discrimination by humans: a retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Kamien J.B., Bickel W.K., Oliveto A.H., Higgins S.T., Hughes J.R., Richards A.T., Badger G.J.

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.

出版信息

Behav Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;6(2):187-194.

PMID:11224326
Abstract

Adult human volunteers (n = 50) were trained to discriminate triazolam (TRZ, 0.32mg/70kg, p.o.) from placebo. Based on a criterion that required greater than 80% capsule-appropriate responding during each of four test sessions, 19 subjects were designated non-discriminators (NDs) and 31 were designated discriminators (Ds). NDs and Ds did not differ significantly in age, weight, gender or previous drug use and generally reported similar effects following TRZ. NDs reported greater effects following placebo than Ds on several measures, including 'good', 'bad', 'high' and sedative drug effects, suggesting that NDs in this study were 'placebo reactors'. These results show that NDs and Ds of TRZ differed in self-reported responses and suggest a close relationship between acquisition of a drug discrimination and self-reported effects of drugs. Moreover, greater placebo effects may hinder acquisition of TRZ discrimination.

摘要

成年人类志愿者(n = 50)接受训练,以区分三唑仑(TRZ,0.32mg/70kg,口服)与安慰剂。基于在四个测试阶段中每个阶段都需要大于80%的胶囊适应性反应的标准,19名受试者被指定为非辨别者(NDs),31名被指定为辨别者(Ds)。NDs和Ds在年龄、体重、性别或既往药物使用方面无显著差异,并且在服用TRZ后通常报告有相似的效果。在包括“良好”、“不良”、“兴奋”和镇静药物效果等多项指标上,NDs报告的安慰剂效果比Ds更强,这表明本研究中的NDs是“安慰剂反应者”。这些结果表明,TRZ的NDs和Ds在自我报告的反应上存在差异,并表明药物辨别能力的获得与药物的自我报告效果之间存在密切关系。此外,更大的安慰剂效应可能会阻碍TRZ辨别的获得。

相似文献

1
Placebo-effects contribute to differences in the acquisition of drug discrimination by humans: a retrospective analysis.安慰剂效应导致人类在药物辨别习得方面存在差异:一项回顾性分析。
Behav Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;6(2):187-194.
2
A low dose alcohol drug discrimination in social drinkers: relationship with subjective effects.社交饮酒者对低剂量酒精的药物辨别:与主观效应的关系。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Oct;157(4):411-20. doi: 10.1007/s002130100817.
3
Caffeine drug discrimination in humans: acquisition, specificity and correlation with self-reports.人类对咖啡因的药物辨别:习得、特异性及其与自我报告的相关性。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Jun;261(3):885-94.
4
Pharmacological specificity of the caffeine discriminative stimulus in humans: effects of theophylline, methylphenidate and buspirone.咖啡因辨别刺激在人类中的药理学特异性:茶碱、哌甲酯和丁螺环酮的作用
Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Jun;4(3):237-246.
5
Individual differences in humans responding under a cocaine discrimination procedure: discriminators versus nondiscriminators.在可卡因辨别程序下人类反应的个体差异:辨别者与非辨别者。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Nov;7(4):391-8. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.7.4.391.
6
Discriminative stimulus and self-reported effects of methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and triazolam in methylphenidate-trained humans.哌甲酯、右旋苯丙胺和三唑仑在经哌甲酯训练的人体中的辨别性刺激及自我报告效应。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Feb;13(1):56-64. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.13.1.56.
7
Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study.乙醇和右旋苯丙胺反应的个体差异:一项受试者内研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Apr;25(4):540-8.
8
Triazolam discrimination by humans under a novel response procedure: effects of buspirone and lorazepam.在一种新型反应程序下人类对三唑仑的辨别:丁螺环酮和劳拉西泮的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 1994 Jun;5(3):315-325. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199406000-00009.
9
Further studies on the discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in humans.
Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;2(4 And 5):357-367.
10
Dose-related caffeine discrimination in normal volunteers: individual differences in subjective effects and self-reported cues.正常志愿者中与剂量相关的咖啡因辨别:主观效应和自我报告线索的个体差异。
Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;2(4 And 5):345-356.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute nicotine reinforcement requires ability to discriminate the stimulus effects of nicotine.急性尼古丁强化需要有辨别尼古丁刺激效应的能力。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Jun;30(3):253-268. doi: 10.1037/pha0000433. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Sex differences in the subjective effects of oral Δ-THC in cannabis users.大麻使用者口服Δ-四氢大麻酚主观效应的性别差异。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2017 Jan;152:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
3
The discriminative stimulus effects of tripelennamine in humans.曲吡那敏对人类的辨别刺激效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jul;126(2):140-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02246349.