Summerton N
Clinical Assessment Programme, University of Hull.
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Dec;50(461):995-1000.
This discussion paper presents the case for a rigorous diagnostic research agenda within primary care. In view of unique aspects of primary care medicine and the relatively unselected nature of the populations encountered by general practitioners, it is clear that diagnostic research undertaken in other settings may be inapplicable. Most diagnostic studies adopt designs that seek to compare items, or clusters of items, of clinical information against a gold standard. In order to enhance the feasibility and rigour of such research within primary care, suggestions are made about priorities and specific key methodological issues. It is essential that the information generated by primary care diagnostic research should be reliable, valid, useful, and useable within general practice. The ultimate objective must be the identification of specific items, or small clusters of items, of clinical information of high discriminant ability among the groups of patients encountered in general practice.
本讨论文件阐述了在初级保健领域开展严格诊断研究议程的理由。鉴于初级保健医学的独特方面以及全科医生所接触人群相对未经筛选的性质,显然在其他环境中进行的诊断研究可能并不适用。大多数诊断研究采用的设计是试图将临床信息的项目或项目组与金标准进行比较。为了提高此类研究在初级保健中的可行性和严谨性,针对优先事项和具体关键方法问题提出了建议。初级保健诊断研究产生的信息必须在全科医疗中可靠、有效、有用且可用。最终目标必须是识别在全科医疗中遇到的患者群体中具有高鉴别能力的特定临床信息项目或小项目组。