• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分形涂层除颤电极:除颤阈值有可能提高吗?

Fractally coated defibrillation electrodes: is an improvement in defibrillation threshold possible?

作者信息

Gradaus R, Böcker D, Dorszewski A, Lamp B, Hammel D, Breithardt G, Block M

机构信息

Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Department of Cardiology & Angiology and Institute for Arteriosclerosis Research, Germany.

出版信息

Europace. 2000 Apr;2(2):154-9. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1999.0084.

DOI:10.1053/eupc.1999.0084
PMID:11225941
Abstract

AIMS

In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), the goals of lowering the defibrillation threshold (DFT) can be achieved by means of higher defibrillation safety margins, more rapid charging of capacitors, improved battery longevity, implying smaller devices. Whether an increase in the electrically active surface of ICD leads by fractal coating results in decreased DFTs is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective randomized cross-over study the defibrillation efficacy of a novel right ventricular endocardial defibrillation electrode fractally coated with iridium was compared with an uncoated but otherwise identical electrode in 30 patients undergoing ICD implantation. In each patient, DFT testing was performed twice according to a binary search protocol introducing the two different electrodes in a random order. The mean DFT was 8.4 +/- 4.1 J with the fractally coated lead and 9.6 +/- 3.6 J using the uncoated lead. The improvement of 1.2 J was statistically not significant (P = 0.11). No differences were observed between the patients with an improved DFT (n =12) and those with an unchanged or worsened DFT (n = 18) concerning age, underlying cardiac disease, NYHA class, or left ventricular ejection fraction, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the electrical surface of defibrillation leads by fractal coating does not lead to a substantial clinically relevant reduction in defibrillation thresholds. Defibrillation impedance is not influenced by the increased electrical surface of the defibrillation lead.

摘要

目的

对于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者,可通过提高除颤安全 margins、加快电容器充电速度、改善电池寿命(意味着设备更小)来实现降低除颤阈值(DFT)的目标。目前尚不清楚通过分形涂层增加 ICD 导线的电活性表面积是否会导致 DFT 降低。

方法和结果

在这项前瞻性随机交叉研究中,将 30 例接受 ICD 植入的患者中,一种新型的经铱分形涂层的右心室心内膜除颤电极的除颤效果与未涂层但其他方面相同的电极进行了比较。在每位患者中,根据二元搜索协议,以随机顺序引入两种不同的电极,进行两次 DFT 测试。分形涂层导线的平均 DFT 为 8.4±4.1 J,未涂层导线的平均 DFT 为 9.6±3.6 J。1.2 J 的改善在统计学上不显著(P = 0.11)。在 DFT 改善的患者(n = 12)和 DFT 未改变或恶化的患者(n = 18)之间,在年龄、潜在心脏病、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级或左心室射血分数方面均未观察到差异。

结论

通过分形涂层增加除颤导线的电表面不会导致临床上与除颤阈值相关的实质性降低。除颤阻抗不受除颤导线电表面增加的影响。

相似文献

1
Fractally coated defibrillation electrodes: is an improvement in defibrillation threshold possible?分形涂层除颤电极:除颤阈值有可能提高吗?
Europace. 2000 Apr;2(2):154-9. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1999.0084.
2
Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.使用带有单线圈或双线圈除颤导线及主动式除颤罐的植入式心律转复除颤器进行除颤效果的比较。
Kardiol Pol. 2005 Sep;63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3.
3
[Estimation of defibrillation threshold using abdominally implanted cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional defibrillation pole in a dual-coil lead endocardial defibrillation system].[在双线圈导线心内膜除颤系统中使用带有额外除颤极的腹部植入式心脏复律除颤器估计除颤阈值]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Feb;22(128):86-9.
4
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
5
Effects of shock polarity reversal on defibrillation threshold in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器中电击极性反转对除颤阈值的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 May;65(5):495-500; discussion 501-2.
6
Intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion: do we really need it?在植入式心脏复律除颤器插入术中进行术中除颤阈值测试:我们真的需要吗?
Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.031.
7
Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.主动式腹部脉冲发生器对采用双线圈经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线系统时除颤阈值的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Jun;17(6):617-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00374.x.
8
Clinical predictors of defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者除颤阈值的临床预测因素
Kardiol Pol. 2005 Apr;62(4):317-28; discussion 329-31.
9
[Cardioverter-defibrillator implantations without thoracotomy: clinical experience with various electrode configurations and defibrillation wave forms of an endocardial/subcutaneous defibrillator system].[无需开胸的心脏复律除颤器植入术:心内膜/皮下除颤器系统不同电极配置和除颤波形的临床经验]
Z Kardiol. 1993 Feb;82(2):99-107.
10
Comparison of defibrillation thresholds using monodirectional electrical vector versus bidirectional electrical vector.
Ital Heart J. 2001 Jun;2(6):449-55.