• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison between passive and active fixation leads in the coronary sinus for biatrial pacing: initial experience.

作者信息

Levy T, Walker S, Rex S, Paul V

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex, UK.

出版信息

Europace. 2000 Jul;2(3):228-32. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0105.

DOI:10.1053/eupc.2000.0105
PMID:11227593
Abstract

AIMS

It has been reported that biatrial pacing can prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. This technique requires a stable coronary sinus (CS) lead position for left atrial pacing. We report our experience of CS pacing with a specifically designed lead [Medtronic 2188 (n= 19)] and active fixation leads [Pacesetter Tendril (n=3), Medtronic Capsurefix (n=6)] in 21 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and a normal mean left atrial size of 39 mm (range 33-54 mm).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Medtronic 2188 lead, successful initial CS canulation and lead positioning was achieved in all 19 patients. One patient developed subclavian vein thrombosis 3 months after initial implant. Eight patients (42%) experienced subsequent lead displacement (12 displacements in total). Of these, seven had their lead replaced with active fixation leads. In addition, two patients underwent active fixation lead implantation at first implant. CS canulation and lead positioning was successful in all nine patients. No patient suffered displacement of an active fixation lead. There were no complications in this group. Twelve of the 19 (66%) Medtronic 2188 leads were functioning at long-term follow-up (11 +/- 4 months) with a biatrial pacing threshold of 2.4 +/- 1 V. Eight of the nine (89%) active fixation leads were functioning at long-term follow-up (6 +/- 3 months) with a biatrial pacing threshold of 2.9 +/- 1.1 V. Using a combined approach 95% of patients had a functioning CS lead at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Active fixation leads can safely be used for left atrial pacing via the CS with good long-term pacing thresholds and stability.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison between passive and active fixation leads in the coronary sinus for biatrial pacing: initial experience.
Europace. 2000 Jul;2(3):228-32. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0105.
2
Single-centre experience with coronary sinus lead stability and long-term pacing parameters.冠状动脉窦导线稳定性及长期起搏参数的单中心经验
Europace. 2007 Jul;9(7):523-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum082. Epub 2007 May 16.
3
Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.双心室起搏中外科心外膜左心室电极与冠状窦电极置入的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.029.
4
First experience with a new active fixation coronary sinus lead.新型主动固定冠状静脉窦电极导线的首次使用体验。
Europace. 2007 Jun;9(6):437-41. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum061. Epub 2007 Apr 21.
5
Long-term stability of endocardial left ventricular pacing leads placed via the coronary sinus.经冠状窦置入的心内膜左心室起搏导线的长期稳定性。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Sep;32(9):1117-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02452.x.
6
Long-term performance of active-fixation pacing leads: a prospective study.主动固定起搏导线的长期性能:一项前瞻性研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;29(3):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00327.x.
7
Long-term performance of screw-in atrial pacing leads: a randomized comparison of J-shaped and straight leads.旋入式心房起搏导线的长期性能:J形导线与直形导线的随机对照比较
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Sep;28(9):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00204.x.
8
[Biatrial pacing as an effective therapy method of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation].[双心房起搏作为阵发性心房颤动的一种有效治疗方法]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2000;150(19-21):419-23.
9
Randomized comparison of J-shaped atrial leads with and without active fixation mechanism.带有和不带有主动固定机制的J形心房电极的随机对照研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Mar;30(3):412-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00683.x.
10
Septal atrial pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation.房间隔起搏预防心房颤动
Europace. 2007 Dec;9(12):1124-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum242. Epub 2007 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Atrial lead perforation early after device implantation-a case report and literature review.装置植入后早期心房导线穿孔——病例报告及文献综述
Front Surg. 2024 Apr 5;11:1290574. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1290574. eCollection 2024.
2
Device-Based Solutions to Improve Cardiac Physiology and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.基于设备的解决方案改善射血分数保留的心衰患者的心脏生理和血流动力学
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 4;6(9-10):772-795. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.06.002. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
3
Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis and Asymptomatic Vein Occlusion in Patients With Transvenous Leads: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
经静脉导线患者的上肢深静脉血栓形成和无症状静脉闭塞:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug 18;8:698336. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.698336. eCollection 2021.
4
Interatrial conduction block-related atrioventricular dyssynchrony treated with dual-site atrial pacing.双部位心房起搏治疗房间传导阻滞相关的房室不同步
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021 Jan 21;7(4):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2021.01.004. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Right versus left atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Riverleft study): study protocol for randomized controlled trial.病态窦房结综合征合并阵发性心房颤动患者右心房起搏与左心房起搏的比较(Riverleft研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Nov 17;15:445. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-445.