• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护环境中的沟通:徒劳无益争议的挑战。

Communication in intensive care settings: the challenge of futility disputes.

作者信息

Fins J J, Solomon M Z

机构信息

New York Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2 Suppl):N10-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102001-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-200102001-00003
PMID:11228567
Abstract

In intensive care settings, suboptimal communication can erode family trust and fuel so-called "futility" disputes. Presenting a teaching case used by >225 hospitals participating in the Decisions Near the End-of-Life program, we identify critical communication challenges and opportunities. We emphasize that good communication requires not only clear and sensitive language but also clinician self-awareness, psychological insight, and an institutional culture that promotes good communication with families. The article concludes with two examples of steps institutions can take to foster good communication between families and healthcare professionals.

摘要

在重症监护环境中,沟通不畅会削弱家属的信任,并引发所谓的“医疗无用性”争议。通过展示一个被超过225家参与“临终决策”项目的医院所使用的教学案例,我们识别出关键的沟通挑战与机遇。我们强调,良好的沟通不仅需要清晰且体贴的语言,还需要临床医生的自我认知、心理洞察力,以及一种促进与家属进行良好沟通的机构文化。文章最后给出了两个机构可以采取的促进家属与医疗保健专业人员之间良好沟通的步骤示例。

相似文献

1
Communication in intensive care settings: the challenge of futility disputes.重症监护环境中的沟通:徒劳无益争议的挑战。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2 Suppl):N10-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102001-00003.
2
Conflicts between healthcare professionals and families of a multi-ethnic patient population during critical care: an ethnographic study.重症监护期间多民族患者群体的医护人员与家属之间的冲突:一项人种志研究。
Crit Care. 2015 Dec 22;19:441. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1158-4.
3
Improving Health Care Provider Communication in End-of-Life Decision-Making.改善医疗服务提供者在临终决策中的沟通。
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2017 Summer;28(2):124-132. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2017302.
4
Communicating about end-of-life care with patients and families in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房与患者及其家属就临终关怀进行沟通。
Crit Care Clin. 2004 Jul;20(3):363-80, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2004.03.001.
5
Futility Disputes: A Review of the Literature and Proposed Model for Dispute Navigation Through Trust Building.无益争议:文献回顾与通过建立信任进行争议导航的模型建议。
J Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;32(9):523-527. doi: 10.1177/0885066616666001. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
The "big picture": communicating with families about end-of-life care in intensive care unit.整体情况:在重症监护病房就临终关怀与家属沟通
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):224-31. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0b013e3181ac4c95.
7
Communicating with patients and their families about advance care planning and end-of-life care.就预先医疗计划和临终关怀与患者及其家属进行沟通。
Respir Care. 2000 Nov;45(11):1385-94; discussion 1394-8.
8
Caring for the family of the critically ill patient.关爱重症患者的家属。
Crit Care Clin. 2004 Jul;20(3):453-66, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2004.03.009.
9
When the truth hurts.当真相伤人时。
Nurs Times. 2002;98(48):22-5.
10
Family-physician interactions in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中家庭医生的互动。
Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2323-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145950.57614.04.

引用本文的文献

1
Can We Satisfy Family in Intensive Care Unit? A Tunisian Experience.我们能让重症监护病房的患者家属满意吗?突尼斯的经验。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;26(2):185-191. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24104.
2
The hard talk: Managing conflict in the cardiac intensive care unit.艰难对话:心脏重症监护病房中的冲突管理
Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Dec;59:101306. doi: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101306. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Rethinking our definition of operative success: predicting early mortality after emergency general surgery colon resection.
重新审视我们对手术成功的定义:预测急诊普通外科结肠切除术后的早期死亡率。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 May 15;4(1):e000244. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000244. eCollection 2019.
4
Content review of pediatric ethics consultations at a cancer center.儿科癌症中心的伦理咨询内容审查。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 May;66(5):e27617. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27617. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
More than half the families of mobile intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.超过一半的移动重症监护病房患者的家属与医生的沟通不够充分。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;41(7):1291-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3890-2. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Reinvigorating ethics consultations: an impetus from the "quality" debate.
HEC Forum. 2006 Dec;18(4):298-304. doi: 10.1007/s10730-006-9020-3.
7
Medical futility: definition, determination, and disputes in critical care.医疗无效:重症监护中的定义、判定及争议
Neurocrit Care. 2005;2(2):198-205. doi: 10.1385/NCC:2:2:198.
8
Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: types, sources, and predictors.重症监护病房长期住院患者护理中的冲突:类型、来源及预测因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep;29(9):1489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1853-5. Epub 2003 Jul 19.