Groff J M, Zinkl J G
Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 1999 Sep;2(3):741-76. doi: 10.1016/s1094-9194(17)30120-2.
Evaluation of the clinical status in aquatic species is compromised by the limited diagnostic techniques that can be performed in these species. The hematologic and plasma chemistry parameters can provide predictive information, although these parameters can be highly variable owing to the influence of various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, these parameters are fairly stable in acclimated, well-managed fish if stress is reduced during collection and samples are properly collected and analyzed. Evaluation of any single parameter is not predictive and, therefore, not recommended. Ideally, the diagnostic protocol should include evaluation of the hematologic indices, total and differential cell counts, TPP, glucose, sodium, and chloride. The practitioner who is routinely involved in aquatic animal medicine should consider in-house evaluation of these parameters.
由于可用于水生生物的诊断技术有限，对其临床状况的评估受到影响。血液学和血浆化学参数可提供预测信息，尽管由于各种内在和外在因素的影响，这些参数可能变化很大。然而，如果在采集过程中减少应激，并正确采集和分析样本，这些参数在适应良好、管理得当的鱼类中相当稳定。对任何单个参数的评估都没有预测性，因此不建议这样做。理想情况下，诊断方案应包括评估血液学指标、总细胞计数和分类细胞计数、总蛋白、葡萄糖、钠和氯。经常从事水生动物医学的从业者应考虑对这些参数进行内部评估。
