Marenco J P, Wang P J, Link M S, Homoud M K, Estes N A
New England Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Division of Cardiology, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
JAMA. 2001 Mar 7;285(9):1193-200. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.9.1193.
Sudden cardiac death is a major public health problem in the United States, and improving survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has been the subject of intense study. Early defibrillation has been shown to be critical to improving survival. Use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) has become an important component of emergency medical systems, and recent advances in AED technology have allowed expansion of AED use to nontraditional first responders and the lay public.
To examine advancements in AED technology, review the impact of AEDs on time to defibrillation and survival, and explore the future role of AEDs in the effort to improve survival following sudden cardiac arrest.
MEDLINE was searched for articles from 1966 through December 2000 (Medical Subject Headings: electric countershock, heart arrest, resuscitation, emergency medical services; keywords: automatic external defibrillator, automated external defibrillator, public access defibrillation). Reference lists of relevant articles, news releases, and product information from manufacturers were also reviewed.
Initial MEDLINE search produced 4816 articles, from which 101 articles were selected for referencing based on having been published in a peer-reviewed journal and on relevance to the subject of the manuscript as determined by all 5 authors.
All studies were critically reviewed for relevance, accuracy, and quality of data and study design by all authors.
Recent advances in AED technology and design have resulted in marked simplification of AED operation, improvements in accuracy and effectiveness, and reductions in cost. Use of AEDs by first responders and laypersons has reduced time to defibrillation and improved survival from sudden cardiac arrest in several communities. Initial studies of the cost-effectiveness of AED use in comparison with other commonly used treatments are favorable.
The AED represents an efficient method of delivering defibrillation to persons experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and its use by both traditional and nontraditional first responders appears to be safe and effective. The rapidly expanding role of AEDs in traditional emergency medical systems is supported by the literature, and initial studies of public access to defibrillation offer hope that further improvements in survival after sudden cardiac death can be achieved.
心脏性猝死是美国一个主要的公共卫生问题,提高院外心脏骤停后的生存率一直是深入研究的课题。早期除颤已被证明对提高生存率至关重要。自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用已成为紧急医疗系统的一个重要组成部分,并且AED技术的最新进展已使AED的使用范围扩大到非传统的急救人员和普通公众。
研究AED技术的进展,回顾AED对除颤时间和生存率的影响,并探讨AED在提高心脏性猝死生存率的努力中的未来作用。
检索MEDLINE数据库中1966年至2000年12月的文章(医学主题词:电除颤、心脏骤停、复苏、紧急医疗服务;关键词:自动体外除颤器、自动体外除颤器、公众可获取除颤)。还查阅了相关文章的参考文献列表、新闻稿以及制造商的产品信息。
MEDLINE的初始检索产生了4816篇文章,基于在同行评审期刊上发表以及所有5位作者确定的与手稿主题的相关性,从中选择了101篇文章作为参考文献。
所有作者对所有研究的数据和研究设计的相关性、准确性和质量进行了严格审查。
AED技术和设计的最新进展已导致AED操作显著简化、准确性和有效性提高以及成本降低。急救人员和普通公众使用AED已减少了除颤时间,并提高了几个社区心脏性猝死的生存率。与其他常用治疗方法相比,对AED使用成本效益的初步研究结果是有利的。
AED是为院外心脏骤停患者提供除颤的一种有效方法,传统和非传统急救人员使用AED似乎都是安全有效的。文献支持AED在传统紧急医疗系统中迅速扩大的作用,对公众可获取除颤的初步研究带来了希望,即心脏性猝死生存率可进一步提高。