Figley C R, Carbonell J L, Boscarino J A, Chang J
Psychosocial Stress Research Program, Florida State University, 2407C University Center, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2570, USA.
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 1999 Summer;1(3):155-64.
Both the evaluation of current treatment interventions and the innovation of new ones are vital to maintaining a viable clinical profession. In the field of psychology, however, often there are serious challenges facing these worthy endeavors. This article reviews several problems and limitations with evaluation of innovative psychotherapy treatments in clinical practice and suggests a strategy to overcome these. This approach, which we term the "Systematic Clinical Demonstration Methodology," (SCDM) combines the skills of clinicians with the rigors of clinical trials methods and permits concurrent clinical innovation and scientific evaluation. Here we suggest that the SCDM approach allows innovative practitioners to assist in the development and evaluation of promising clinical interventions by working closely with clinical trials researchers. This allows innovative clinicians to demonstrate new treatment approaches, while clinical researchers evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these interventions using clinical trials methods that incorporate qualitative data. We suggest that this approach can result in the development and evaluation of new treatment innovations more quickly and cost effectively than traditionally has been the case. In addition, some limitations commonly associated with clinical trials, such as not treating patients typically found in clinical practice, failing to treat patients with multiple disorders, or treating patients from different cultural or sociodemographic groups, can be more effectively addressed. Our experiences with using this method to evaluate different psychotherapy treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder are presented as an example of this new approach.
评估当前的治疗干预措施以及创新新的措施对于维持一个可行的临床专业至关重要。然而,在心理学领域,这些有价值的努力常常面临严峻挑战。本文回顾了临床实践中创新心理治疗评估的若干问题和局限性,并提出了克服这些问题的策略。我们将这种方法称为“系统临床示范方法”(SCDM),它将临床医生的技能与临床试验方法的严谨性相结合,允许同时进行临床创新和科学评估。在此我们认为,SCDM方法使创新从业者能够通过与临床试验研究人员密切合作,协助开发和评估有前景的临床干预措施。这使创新临床医生能够展示新的治疗方法,而临床研究人员则使用纳入定性数据的临床试验方法评估这些干预措施的有效性和安全性。我们认为,与传统情况相比,这种方法能够更快且更经济高效地开发和评估新的治疗创新。此外,一些通常与临床试验相关的局限性,比如不治疗临床实践中常见的患者、不治疗患有多种疾病的患者,或者不治疗来自不同文化或社会人口统计学群体的患者,都能够得到更有效的解决。我们以使用这种方法评估创伤后应激障碍的不同心理治疗为例,展示这种新方法。