Haddad S L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Foot Ankle Clin. 2000 Sep;5(3):629-61.
Though osteotomies for relief of hallux limitus and rigidus have been around since the earliest surgical corrections, no sound clinical studies have been performed to warrant their use over the standard accepted techniques of cheilectomy and arthrodesis. These operations are surely more technically demanding than such standard procedures, and involve significant increased risk and postoperative immobilization than cheilectomy alone. Sound theories such as metatarsus primus elevatus and excessive metatarsal length contributing to hallux rigidus have never been proven, and no accurate way to diagnose these structural deformities has been proposed. These operations are intriguing and some make clinical sense. It remains to be seen whether the orthopedic community will adopt them based on their merits.
尽管用于缓解拇趾僵硬症的截骨术自最早的外科矫正手术以来就已存在,但尚未进行可靠的临床研究来证明其比公认的标准手术方法(如关节切除术和关节融合术)更具优势。这些手术在技术上肯定比此类标准手术要求更高,而且与单纯的关节切除术相比,风险显著增加,术后固定时间也更长。诸如第一跖骨抬高和跖骨过长导致拇趾僵硬症等合理理论从未得到证实,也没有提出准确诊断这些结构畸形的方法。这些手术很有趣,有些在临床上也说得通。骨科界是否会基于其优点采用这些手术还有待观察。