Kappenberger L J, Linde C, Jeanrenaud X, Daubert C, McKenna W, Meisel E, Sadoul N, Chojnowska L, Guize L, Gras D, Aebischer N, Gadler F, Rydén L
PIC Coordination Centre, Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Europace. 1999 Apr;1(2):77-84. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1998.0024.
The therapeutic options for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) classically include medical treatment with beta-blockers and calcium antagonists or myectomy-myotomy as a surgical possibility for refractory cases. The observation that pacemaker activation of the heart in HOCM reduces the subaortic gradient is well known but less well investigated.
Eighty-three patients (33 female and 50 male) mean age 53 (18-82) years, with symptoms refractory to drug treatment and a resting gradient above 30 mmHg, who responded favourably to temporary pacing, were included in this prospective study and had a pacemaker (DDD) implanted. After an initial double-blind crossover phase of 6 months, patients were reinvestigated at 12 months and followed for a mean of 36 months.
As observed during a screening investigation, the obstruction was significantly reduced from 72 +/- 35 mmHg to 29 +/- 24 mmHg (P < 0.01) when the pacemaker was on, while no major effect was seen during the sham phase. The effect was persistent at 1 year with a remaining resting gradient of 28 +/- 24 mmHg. In parallel, we documented an improvement in functional capacity, according to the NYHA classification and by quality of life analysis, and a significant improvement in dyspnoea and angina. Exercise on treadmill improved only in patients with reduced initial tolerance (< 8 min). During the mean follow-up of 36 months, 65 patients remained on pacing alone, with eight patients having additional AV-node ablation and five patients finally having surgery.
This controlled multicentre study shows that pacemaker treatment is an option for HOCM patients; it is inoffensive and does not exclude alternative methods, but satisfies 79% of patients beyond 3 years.
肥厚性梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)的传统治疗选择包括使用β受体阻滞剂和钙拮抗剂进行药物治疗,或对于难治性病例采用外科手术进行室间隔心肌切除术-肌切开术。HOCM患者通过起搏器激活心脏可降低主动脉下梯度这一现象已为人熟知,但较少得到深入研究。
本前瞻性研究纳入了83例患者(33例女性和50例男性),平均年龄53岁(18 - 82岁),这些患者药物治疗无效且静息梯度超过30 mmHg,对临时起搏反应良好,并植入了起搏器(DDD)。在最初6个月的双盲交叉阶段后,于12个月时对患者进行再次检查,并平均随访36个月。
如在筛查研究中所观察到的,起搏器开启时梗阻显著减轻,从72±35 mmHg降至29±24 mmHg(P < 0.01),而在假手术阶段未观察到明显效果。1年后该效果持续存在,静息梯度仍为28±24 mmHg。同时,根据纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级和生活质量分析,我们记录到患者的功能能力有所改善,呼吸困难和心绞痛也有显著改善。仅初始耐受性降低(< 8分钟)的患者在跑步机上的运动能力有所提高。在平均36个月的随访期间,65例患者仅接受起搏治疗,8例患者额外进行了房室结消融,5例患者最终接受了手术。
这项对照多中心研究表明,起搏器治疗是HOCM患者的一种选择;它无创且不排除其他替代方法,但3年以上能使79%的患者满意。