• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach.

作者信息

Zinn J, Zalokowski A, Hunter L

机构信息

Program in Healthcare Management, Department of Risk, Insurance and Healthcare Management, School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2001 Winter;26(1):40-53. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200101000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00004010-200101000-00004
PMID:11233353
Abstract

The challenges for laboratory management posed by cost control, managed care, organizational restructuring, information networking and health system integration call for new measures to evaluate how effectively laboratories manage emerging performance expectations. This study identifies the Delphi panel method in achieving consensus on measures of effectiveness and considers a specific application, the identification of indicators of laboratory performance, from the perspective of key constituencies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2001 Winter;26(1):40-53. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200101000-00004.
2
How do you measure up? Start using benchmarking tactics as a yardstick for success.
Healthc Inform. 1999 Feb;16(2):183-4, 186, 188 passim.
3
Developing key laboratory performance indicators: a feasibility study. Potential roles for CLMA.
Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1995 May-Jun;9(3):178-98.
4
The strategic role of health informatics in integrated delivery systems.
J Healthc Qual. 1998 Sep-Oct;20(5):4-7; quiz 15. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1998.tb00277.x.
5
Effects of reorganization on laboratory quality: preliminary findings and lessons learned.
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2002 Sep-Oct;16(5):293-305.
6
The new organization of the health care delivery system.医疗服务提供系统的新组织形式。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:101-48.
7
A clear pathway to success. Integrated care management tools for managing cost and quality.一条通向成功的清晰路径。用于管理成本和质量的综合护理管理工具。
Cost Qual Q J. 1997 Apr;3(2):29-32.
8
Success in managed care: improving clinical quality.
Physician Exec. 1997 Apr;23(4):24-31.
9
Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.评估健康计划质量2:衡量健康计划质量的调查设计原则
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9 Spec No 2:SP65-75.
10
Charting reengineering potential: a PFCA benchmark study. A first look at outcome measures across reengineering hospitals.
PFCA Rev. 1996 Fall:2-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of the Delphi methodology to forecast competencies oriented towards AI-driven disinformation detection in an expanded DigComp framework.德尔菲法在扩展的DigComp框架中预测面向人工智能驱动的虚假信息检测能力方面的应用。
MethodsX. 2025 Jun 1;14:103401. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103401. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The burnout: a silent saboteur in in vitro fertilization laboratories.职业倦怠:体外受精实验室中的隐形破坏者。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03537-y.
3
The benefits of tourism for rural community development.
旅游业对农村社区发展的益处。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):137. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01610-4. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
4
Can We Reach a Consensus on the Appropriate Use of Before and After Photos in Breast Surgery?我们能否就乳房手术前后照片的合理使用达成共识?
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jul 16;9(7):e3682. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003682. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Clinical laboratory as an economic model for business performance analysis.临床实验室作为商业绩效分析的经济模型。
Croat Med J. 2011 Aug 15;52(4):513-9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.513.
6
Consensus group sessions: a useful method to reconcile stakeholders' perspectives about network performance evaluation.共识小组会议:一种协调利益相关者对网络性能评估观点的有用方法。
Int J Integr Care. 2010 Dec 9;10:e117. doi: 10.5334/ijic.537.
7
Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives.急诊科绩效的相互竞争的价值观:平衡多个利益相关者的观点。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):771-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00257.x.
8
Quality management practices in telehealth programs: a stakeholder accountability framework.远程医疗项目中的质量管理实践:利益相关者问责框架
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:190-4.