Suppr超能文献

患者自行给药伴侣治疗在乌干达性伴侣治疗中的疗效。

Efficacy of patient-delivered partner medication in the treatment of sexual partners in Uganda.

作者信息

Nuwaha F, Kambugu F, Nsubuga P S, Höjer B, Faxelid E

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Mbarara University,

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Feb;28(2):105-10. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200102000-00008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-based partner referral (PBPR), which is the main method for treating sexual partners of patients with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), has limited effectiveness.

GOAL

The authors compared the efficacy of PBPR with patient-delivered partner medication (PDPM) among patients attending the Mulago STD clinic in Kampala, Uganda.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 383 patients (187 women, 196 men) with STDs were randomized to the PBPR or PDPM group. The proportion of sexual partners treated in either group was compared using the chi-square statistic by intention to treat for partners whose follow-up status was unknown.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar background characteristics. Of the 237 partners elicited, 176 (74%) were reported treated in the PDPM group. In the PBPR group, in which 234 partners were elicited, 79 (34%) were referred to the treatment clinic. This difference was statistically significant (risk ratio [RR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.95-3.07; P < 0.001). Furthermore, PDPM was more effective than PBPR for women and for casual partners for whom PBPR is considered difficult. For women, 86 of 103 partners in the PDPM group were reported treated, compared with 23 of 104 partners in the PBPR group (RR, 4.55; 95% CI, 2.92-7.08; P < 0.001). For casual partners, 18 of 51 (34%) were reported treated in the PDPM group, compared with only three of 45 partners (7%) who were referred in the PBPR group (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.40-2.65; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patient-delivered partner medication is more effective than patient-based partner referral in the treatment of sexual partners.

摘要

背景

基于患者的性伴转诊(PBPR)是治疗性传播疾病(STD)患者性伴的主要方法,但其有效性有限。

目的

作者比较了在乌干达坎帕拉穆拉戈STD诊所就诊的患者中,PBPR与患者发放性伴药物(PDPM)的疗效。

研究设计

总共383例STD患者(187例女性,196例男性)被随机分为PBPR组或PDPM组。对于随访状态未知的性伴,采用卡方统计量按意向性治疗比较两组中接受治疗的性伴比例。

结果

两组具有相似的背景特征。在引出的237名性伴中,PDPM组报告有176名(74%)接受了治疗。在引出234名性伴的PBPR组中,79名(34%)被转诊至治疗诊所。这一差异具有统计学意义(风险比[RR],2.44;95%可信区间[CI],1.95 - 3.07;P < 0.001)。此外,对于女性以及被认为PBPR困难的临时性伴,PDPM比PBPR更有效。对于女性,PDPM组103名性伴中有86名报告接受了治疗,而PBPR组104名性伴中只有23名(RR,4.55;95% CI,2.92 - 7.08;P < 0.001)。对于临时性伴,PDPM组51名中有18名(34%)报告接受了治疗,而PBPR组45名性伴中只有3名(7%)被转诊(RR,1.43;95% CI,1.40 - 2.65;P < 0.01)。

结论

在治疗性伴方面,患者发放性伴药物比基于患者的性伴转诊更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验