Rossman B B, Gollob H F
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Feb;31(2):271-81. doi: 10.1037/h0076290.
Social judgment of creativity and intelligence was investigated by having subjects give trait ratings for stimulus profiles of actual art students based on abilities information alone, based on personality information alone, based on biographical information alone, and finally, based on the total set of all three types of cue information. Regression equations differed depending upon whether intelligence or creativity judgments were being predicted. For all types of information, there was a significant amount of variation unique to creativity judgments which could not be accounted for by intelligence judgments, and vice versa. However, the proposition of variation unique to each type of trait judgment was smallest when subjects had only abilities information available and was approximately four times larger when judgments were based on the total set of three types of cue information. Implications of this finding for the study of creativity are discussed.
通过让受试者仅根据能力信息、仅根据个性信息、仅根据传记信息,最后根据所有三种线索信息的全集,对实际艺术专业学生的刺激概况给出特质评分,来研究对创造力和智力的社会判断。回归方程因预测的是智力判断还是创造力判断而有所不同。对于所有类型的信息,创造力判断存在大量独特的变异,无法用智力判断来解释,反之亦然。然而,当受试者仅拥有能力信息时,每种特质判断独特变异的命题最小,而当判断基于三种线索信息的全集时,该命题大约大四倍。讨论了这一发现对创造力研究的启示。