Jenkinson A D, Al-Mufti R A, Mohsen Y, Berry M J, Wells C, Carpenter R
The Breast Surgery Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, The Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Feb;27(1):21-5. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2000.1051.
Breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer is now routinely used as an alternative to mastectomy. Despite post-operative radiotherapy, early local recurrence of tumour remains a concern. It has been reported that invasive and in-situ ductal carcinoma spread locally through the ductal tree in a segmental distribution, however, there is no consensus as to the best surgical method to maximize tumour clearance whilst leaving a good cosmetic result.
We aimed to measure the effectiveness of segmental mastectomy (excision of tumour plus associated segmental ductal tissue) in the clearance of different tumour types. Bed biopsy of the excision cavity was employed to assess the rate of incomplete excision or the multifocality of certain breast cancers.
One hundred and one patients with breast cancers underwent segmental mastectomy and cavity bed biopsies. Specimens were assessed for tumour type and completeness of excision. An excision of the cancer was considered incomplete if the margins were involved or if any of the bed biopsies showed residual or multifocal tumour.
A total of 24 patients had incomplete tumour excision. Invasive ductal carcinoma was more likely to be completely excised by segmental mastectomy than invasive lobular carcinoma (P<0.05). Incomplete excision was associated with multifocality and the presence of extensive DCIS. The report of clear pathological margins was significantly more likely to be accurate, as measured by negative bed biopsies, in invasive ductal carcinoma when compared to invasive lobular carcinoma (P<0.05).
These results support the concept that ductal carcinomas spread locally in a segmental fashion. Patients with invasive ductal carcinomas are more likely to benefit from breast conserving surgery that is tailored to include the associated ductal tissue, in a segmental fashioned excision.
早期乳腺癌的保乳手术目前已常规用作乳房切除术的替代方法。尽管术后进行了放疗,但肿瘤的早期局部复发仍是一个令人担忧的问题。据报道,浸润性和原位导管癌通过导管系统呈节段性局部扩散,然而,对于在获得良好美容效果的同时最大化肿瘤清除率的最佳手术方法尚无共识。
我们旨在测量节段性乳房切除术(切除肿瘤及相关节段性导管组织)对不同肿瘤类型的清除效果。采用切除腔床活检来评估某些乳腺癌的不完全切除率或多灶性。
101例乳腺癌患者接受了节段性乳房切除术和腔床活检。对标本进行肿瘤类型和切除完整性评估。如果切缘受累或任何床活检显示有残留或多灶性肿瘤,则认为癌症切除不完全。
共有24例患者肿瘤切除不完全。节段性乳房切除术对浸润性导管癌的完全切除可能性高于浸润性小叶癌(P<0.05)。不完全切除与多灶性和广泛导管原位癌的存在有关。与浸润性小叶癌相比,浸润性导管癌经床活检阴性测量,病理切缘阴性报告的准确性显著更高(P<0.05)。
这些结果支持导管癌以节段性方式局部扩散的概念。浸润性导管癌患者更有可能从针对相关导管组织进行节段性切除的保乳手术中获益。