Farrar J D, Ouyang W, Löhning M, Assenmacher M, Radbruch A, Kanagawa O, Murphy K M
Department of Pathology and Center for Immunology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Exp Med. 2001 Mar 5;193(5):643-50. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.5.643.
Although interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-4 polarize naive CD4(+) T cells toward T helper cell type 1 (Th1) or Th2 phenotypes, it is not known whether cytokines instruct the developmental fate in uncommitted progenitors or select for outgrowth of cells that have stochastically committed to a particular fate. To distinguish these instructive and selective models, we used surface affinity matrix technology to isolate committed progenitors based on cytokine secretion phenotype and developed retroviral-based tagging approaches to directly monitor individual progenitor fate decisions at the clonal and population levels. We observe IL-4-dependent redirection of phenotype in cells that have already committed to a non-IL-4-producing fate, inconsistent with predictions of the selective model. Further, retroviral tagging of naive progenitors with the Th2-specific transcription factor GATA-3 provided direct evidence for instructive differentiation, and no evidence for the selective outgrowth of cells committed to either the Th1 or Th2 fate. These data would seem to exclude selection as an exclusive mechanism in Th1/Th2 differentiation, and support an instructive model of cytokine-driven transcriptional programming of cell fate decisions.
尽管白细胞介素(IL)-12和IL-4可使初始CD4(+) T细胞向1型辅助性T细胞(Th1)或2型辅助性T细胞(Th2)表型极化,但尚不清楚细胞因子是指导未定向祖细胞的发育命运,还是选择已随机定向至特定命运的细胞进行扩增。为区分这些指导性和选择性模型,我们使用表面亲和基质技术,根据细胞因子分泌表型分离定向祖细胞,并开发了基于逆转录病毒的标记方法,以在克隆和群体水平直接监测单个祖细胞的命运决定。我们观察到,在已定向至不产生IL-4命运的细胞中,表型出现了IL-4依赖性重定向,这与选择性模型的预测不一致。此外,用Th2特异性转录因子GATA-3对初始祖细胞进行逆转录病毒标记,为指导性分化提供了直接证据,而没有证据表明已定向至Th1或Th2命运的细胞存在选择性扩增。这些数据似乎排除了选择作为Th1/Th2分化的唯一机制,并支持细胞因子驱动细胞命运决定的转录编程的指导性模型。