de Vries B B, White S M, Knight S J, Regan R, Homfray T, Young I D, Super M, McKeown C, Splitt M, Quarrell O W, Trainer A H, Niermeijer M F, Malcolm S, Flint J, Hurst J A, Winter R M
Clinical and Molecular Genetics Unit, Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
J Med Genet. 2001 Mar;38(3):145-50. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.3.145.
Submicroscopic subtelomeric chromosome defects have been found in 7.4% of children with moderate to severe mental retardation and in 0.5% of children with mild retardation. Effective clinical preselection is essential because of the technical complexities and cost of screening for subtelomere deletions.
We studied 29 patients with a known subtelomeric defect and assessed clinical variables concerning birth history, facial dysmorphism, congenital malformations, and family history. Controls were 110 children with mental retardation of unknown aetiology with normal G banded karyotype and no detectable submicroscopic subtelomeric abnormalities.
Prenatal onset of growth retardation was found in 37% compared to 9% of the controls (p<0.0005). A higher percentage of positive family history for mental retardation was reported in the study group than the controls (50% v 21%, p=0.002). Miscarriage(s) were observed in only 8% of the mothers of subtelomeric cases compared to 30% of controls (p=0.028) which was, however, not significant after a Bonferroni correction. Common features (>30%) among subtelomeric deletion cases were microcephaly, short stature, hypertelorism, nasal and ear anomalies, hand anomalies, and cryptorchidism. Two or more facial dysmorphic features were observed in 83% of the subtelomere patients. None of these features was significantly different from the controls. Using the results, a five item checklist was developed which allowed exclusion from further testing in 20% of the mentally retarded children (95% CI 13-28%) in our study without missing any subtelomere cases. As our control group was selected for the "chromosomal phenotype", the specificity of the checklist is likely to be higher in an unselected group of mentally retarded subjects.
Our results suggest that good indicators for subtelomeric defects are prenatal onset of growth retardation and a positive family history for mental retardation. These clinical criteria, in addition to features suggestive of a chromosomal phenotype, resulted in the development of a five item checklist which will improve the diagnostic pick up rate of subtelomeric defects among mentally retarded subjects.
在7.4%的中重度智力发育迟缓儿童以及0.5%的轻度智力发育迟缓儿童中发现了亚微观亚端粒染色体缺陷。由于亚端粒缺失筛查技术复杂且成本高昂,有效的临床预筛选至关重要。
我们研究了29例已知亚端粒缺陷的患者,并评估了有关出生史、面部畸形、先天性畸形和家族史的临床变量。对照组为110例病因不明的智力发育迟缓儿童,其G带核型正常且未检测到亚微观亚端粒异常。
37%的研究组患者存在产前生长发育迟缓,而对照组为9%(p<0.0005)。研究组中智力发育迟缓家族史阳性的比例高于对照组(50%对21%,p=0.002)。亚端粒病例的母亲中仅有8%有流产史,而对照组为30%(p=0.028),不过经Bonferroni校正后无统计学意义。亚端粒缺失病例中常见特征(>30%)包括小头畸形、身材矮小、眼距增宽、鼻和耳异常、手部异常以及隐睾。83%的亚端粒患者有两种或更多面部畸形特征。这些特征与对照组相比均无显著差异。利用这些结果,制定了一个五项检查表,在我们的研究中,该检查表可使20%的智力发育迟缓儿童(95%可信区间13 - 28%)无需进一步检测,且不会遗漏任何亚端粒病例。由于我们的对照组是根据“染色体表型”选择的,因此该检查表在未选择的智力发育迟缓受试者群体中的特异性可能更高。
我们的结果表明,产前生长发育迟缓以及智力发育迟缓家族史阳性是亚端粒缺陷的良好指标。这些临床标准,再加上提示染色体表型的特征,促成了一个五项检查表的制定,这将提高智力发育迟缓受试者中亚端粒缺陷的诊断检出率。