• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What is learned in patterning discriminations? Further tests of configural accounts of associative learning in human electrodermal conditioning.

作者信息

Lachnit H, Lober K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, D-35039, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Biol Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(1):45-61. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00087-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00087-9
PMID:11240314
Abstract

Two Pavlovian SCR conditioning experiments investigated positive and negative patterning discriminations in humans by means of transfer tests. In Experiment 1, positive patterning (A-,B-,AB+) was trained interleaved with non-reinforced presentations of an additional stimulus (C-). Then responding to new compounds consisting of either already trained elements (AC,BC) or new elements (DE) was examined. In Experiment 2, negative patterning (A+,B+,AB-) was trained interleaved with reinforced presentations of an additional stimulus (C+). Again, we examined responding to new compounds consisting of either already trained elements (AC,BC) or new elements (DE). In both experiments the initial patterning discrimination was solved successfully. The response patterns to the test compounds in both experiments were in contradiction to configural accounts of associative learning. In positive patterning human participants seemed to utilize 'number' or some other abstract feature in preference to available concrete stimuli. In negative patterning the abstract dimension of 'separate-versus-together' or 'opposite' was used.

摘要

相似文献

1
What is learned in patterning discriminations? Further tests of configural accounts of associative learning in human electrodermal conditioning.
Biol Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(1):45-61. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00087-9.
2
Evidence for the application of rules in Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning with humans.
Biol Psychol. 2001 May;56(2):151-66. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(01)00067-9.
3
Experimental manipulation of a unique cue in Pavlovian SCR conditioning with humans.对人类进行的巴甫洛夫式皮肤电反应条件反射中独特线索的实验性操纵。
Biol Psychol. 2000 Jul;53(2-3):105-29. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00043-0.
4
Are rules applied in Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning with humans general or outcome specific?
Psychophysiology. 2002 May;39(3):380-7. doi: 10.1017/s0048577201393125.
5
Further investigations of stimulus coding in nonlinear discrimination problems.
Biol Psychol. 2000 Nov;55(1):57-73. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00064-8.
6
The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination.使用来自三个不同维度的刺激对复杂负性模式辨别自动塑造的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2002 Oct;55(4):349-64. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000061.
7
Representations of single and compound stimuli in negative and positive patterning.单一和复合刺激在阴性和阳性模式中的表征。
Learn Behav. 2009 Aug;37(3):230-45. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.3.230.
8
Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.双条件和模式辨别中的基本、构型及情境设置机制
Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
9
Summation effects in human learning: evidence from patterning discriminations in goal-tracking.人类学习中的累加效应:来自目标追踪中模式辨别实验的证据
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jul;70(7):1366-1379. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1184290. Epub 2016 May 25.
10
Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.巴甫洛夫式模糊目标辨别中的情境设定
Behav Processes. 2008 Nov;79(3):132-47. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Indicators of early and late processing reveal the importance of within-trial-time for theories of associative learning.早期和晚期加工指标揭示了联合学习理论中试验内时间的重要性。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066291. Print 2013.
2
Rats are sensitive to ambiguity.老鼠对歧义很敏感。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1230-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0171-0.
3
Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning.结果效价对人类因果推理中正向和负向模式的影响。
Learn Behav. 2010 May;38(2):145-59. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.2.145.