Suppr超能文献

灵长目人猿亚目的起源:牙齿证据及化石记录中早期类人猿的识别,并对亚洲类人猿辐射现象加以评论。

Origin of anthropoidea: dental evidence and recognition of early anthropoids in the fossil record, with comments on the Asian anthropoid radiation.

作者信息

Gunnell G F, Miller E R

机构信息

Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1079, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Mar;114(3):177-91. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3<177::AID-AJPA1019>3.0.CO;2-O.

Abstract

Among the earliest fossil anthropoid primates known are Catopithecus browni, Serapia eocaena, Arsinoea kallimos, and Proteopithecus sylviae, from the late Eocene quarry L-41, Fayum Depression, Egypt. Two of these taxa, C. browni and S. eocaena, may be the oldest known members of the Propliopithecidae and Parapithecidae, respectively, while A. kallimos and P. sylviae are archaic anthropoids of less certain familial affiliation. Dental features of C. browni, S. eocaena, A. kallimos, and P. sylviae are compared with those of younger propliopithecids and parapithecids from the Fayum in order to determine the morphocline polarities of dental features among these early anthropoids. From this, a basal African anthropoid dental morphotype is constructed. Among the features of this morphotype are: dental formula of 2.1.3.3; incisors subvertically implanted and somewhat spatulate; p2 as large as p3, both lacking paraconids; p4 weakly obliquely oriented but not exodaenodont; all lower molars with small paraconids present; upper anterior premolars lacking protocone; upper molars with small, cingular hypocones, all cheek teeth nonbunodont; and canines projecting but not necessarily sexually dimorphic. Comparisons are made between this African anthropoid morphotype and two of the best-represented proposed basal anthropoids, Eosimias and Djebelemur, with the result that neither appears to be a good candidate to have been ancestral to the African anthropoids. Other possible basal simians such as Algeripithecus, Tabelia, and Biretia also are evaluated but are too poorly known for adequate analysis. The larger-bodied Asian primates Pondaungia, Amphipithecus, and Siamopithecus also are not likely ancestors for African anthropoids, but like Eosimias they may share a common ancestry. Despite many recent claims of an Asian origin for anthropoids, the evidence remains far from compelling. The true origins of Anthropoidea remain obscure.

摘要

已知最早的化石类人猿灵长目动物包括来自埃及法尤姆凹陷始新世晚期L - 41采石场的布朗卡托猿(Catopithecus browni)、始新世塞拉皮猿(Serapia eocaena)、卡里莫斯阿西诺猿(Arsinoea kallimos)和西尔维亚原猿(Proteopithecus sylviae)。其中两个分类单元,即布朗卡托猿和始新世塞拉皮猿,可能分别是已知最古老的原上猿科(Propliopithecidae)和副猿科(Parapithecidae)成员,而卡里莫斯阿西诺猿和西尔维亚原猿是亲缘关系不太确定的古老类人猿。将布朗卡托猿、始新世塞拉皮猿、卡里莫斯阿西诺猿和西尔维亚原猿的牙齿特征与法尤姆地区年代较晚的原上猿类和副猿类的牙齿特征进行比较,以确定这些早期类人猿牙齿特征的形态渐变极性。据此构建了一个基础非洲类人猿牙齿形态类型。该形态类型的特征包括:齿式为2.1.3.3;门齿近垂直植入且略呈铲形;p2与p3一样大,两者均无下前附尖;p4略呈斜向但非外齿型;所有下臼齿均有小的下前附尖;上前臼齿无原尖;上臼齿有小的、位于齿带的下小尖,所有颊齿非丘型齿;犬齿突出但不一定有两性异形。将这种非洲类人猿形态类型与两种代表性较好的假定基础类人猿——曙猿(Eosimias)和杰贝勒狐猴(Djebelemur)进行比较,结果表明它们似乎都不是非洲类人猿祖先的合适候选者。其他可能的基础猴类,如阿尔及利亚猿(Algeripithecus)、塔贝利猿(Tabelia)和比雷提亚猿(Biretia)也进行了评估,但由于了解太少无法进行充分分析。体型较大的亚洲灵长目动物蓬当猿(Pondaungia)、双猿(Amphipithecus)和暹罗猿(Siamopithecus)也不太可能是非洲类人猿的祖先,但与曙猿一样,它们可能有共同的祖先。尽管最近有许多关于类人猿起源于亚洲的说法,但证据仍远不具有说服力。类人猿的真正起源仍然不明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验