Ciochon Russell L, Gunnell Gregg F
Department of Anthropology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1322, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;Suppl 35:2-35. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10175.
The history of primate paleontology in Asia is long and complex, beginning with the first discoveries of fossil primates on the Indian subcontinent in the early 1830's. The first Eocene mammals from Asia were collected in Myanmar and described in 1916, while the first primates, Pondaungia and Amphipithecus, were described in 1927 and 1937, respectively, both from the Pondaung Formation in Myanmar. For the next 60 years, these two Pondaung taxa remained as the only known Eocene primates from Myanmar and one of the few records of Eocene primates from all of Asia. Taxonomically, Pondaungia and Amphipithecus were linked with a number of different groups, including archaic, hoofed ungulates (condylarths), adapiform primates, omomyid primates, and anthropoids. While no consensus existed, Pondaungia and Amphipithecus were most commonly compared with anthropoids. Beginning in the late 1990s, new primates were discovered in Myanmar, including smaller-bodied forms such as Bahinia and Myanmarpithecus. Also, new and better specimens of the larger-bodied Pondaungia and Amphipithecus began to appear, including the first cranial and postcranial fragments. Evaluations based on these new specimens, especially the postcrania, indicate that the two larger-bodied Myanmar taxa are adapiform primates that show their closest affinities to North American notharctines. The smaller-bodied taxa remain enigmatic, but may share their closest affinities with North American and Asian omomyid primates and Asian Tarsius. None of the known Asian primate taxa appear closely related to African anthropoids, which suggests that true anthropoids did not reach Asia until the latest Oligocene or earliest Miocene. These facts make an Asian origin for Anthropoidea unlikely. Additional and earlier evidence from both Asia and Africa is required before the ultimate origin of anthropoids can be determined. It appears possible that true anthropoids were an ancient radiation that may have been part of a Gondwanan (southern hemisphere) community that is, at present, poorly sampled and little understood.
亚洲灵长类古生物学的历史漫长而复杂,始于19世纪30年代初在印度次大陆首次发现灵长类化石。亚洲最早的始新世哺乳动物是在缅甸采集的,并于1916年进行了描述,而最早的灵长类动物庞当猴(Pondaungia)和双猴(Amphipithecus)分别于1927年和1937年被描述,二者均来自缅甸的庞当组。在接下来的60年里,这两个来自庞当的分类单元一直是缅甸已知的仅有的始新世灵长类动物,也是整个亚洲始新世灵长类动物的少数记录之一。在分类学上,庞当猴和双猴与许多不同的类群有关联,包括古老的有蹄类动物(踝节类)、兔猴型灵长类动物、鼠猴型灵长类动物和类人猿。虽然没有达成共识,但庞当猴和双猴最常被与类人猿进行比较。从20世纪90年代末开始,在缅甸发现了新的灵长类动物,包括体型较小的类型,如巴尼亚猴(Bahinia)和缅甸猿(Myanmarpithecus)。此外,体型较大的庞当猴和双猴的新的、更好的标本也开始出现,包括第一批颅骨和颅后骨骼碎片。基于这些新标本,尤其是颅后骨骼的评估表明,缅甸的这两个体型较大的分类单元是兔猴型灵长类动物,它们与北美北狐猴科动物关系最为密切。体型较小的分类单元仍然很神秘,但可能与北美和亚洲的鼠猴型灵长类动物以及亚洲眼镜猴关系最为密切。已知的亚洲灵长类分类单元中没有一个似乎与非洲类人猿有密切关系,这表明真正的类人猿直到渐新世晚期或中新世早期才到达亚洲。这些事实使得类人猿起源于亚洲的可能性不大。在确定类人猿的最终起源之前,需要来自亚洲和非洲的更多更早的证据。看起来真正的类人猿可能是一个古老的辐射类群,可能是冈瓦纳(南半球)群落的一部分,而目前这个群落的样本很少,了解也很少。