• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与年龄相关的认知减缓中的任务特异性:词汇生成与概念比较。

Task specificity in age-related slowing: word production versus conceptual comparison.

作者信息

Doose G, Feyereisen P

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001 Mar;56(2):P85-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.2.p85.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/56.2.p85
PMID:11245362
Abstract

We analyzed age-related slowing in 29 younger (M = 22 years) and 30 older adults (M = 70 years) who performed a conceptual comparison task, a naming task, and a simple reaction time task. Both vocal and manual responses were elicited in all except the naming task. Results did not support the hypothesis that there is greater age-related slowing in comparison tasks than in production tasks. In contrast, we found an interaction between age and response modality in the conceptual comparison task. Response latencies of younger participants were shorter in the manual modality whereas those of older participants were shorter in the vocal modality. In the simple reaction time task manual responses were faster in the two age groups. These findings are discussed in relation to models assuming task-specific slowing factors.

摘要

我们分析了29名较年轻成年人(平均年龄22岁)和30名较年长成年人(平均年龄70岁)与年龄相关的反应迟缓情况,这些参与者完成了一项概念比较任务、一项命名任务和一项简单反应时任务。除命名任务外,在所有任务中都引发了言语和手动反应。结果并不支持以下假设:与生产任务相比,比较任务中与年龄相关的反应迟缓更为明显。相反,我们发现在概念比较任务中年龄与反应方式之间存在交互作用。较年轻参与者在手动反应方式下的反应潜伏期较短,而较年长参与者在言语反应方式下的反应潜伏期较短。在简单反应时任务中,两个年龄组的手动反应都更快。我们将结合假设任务特定减缓因素的模型来讨论这些发现。

相似文献

1
Task specificity in age-related slowing: word production versus conceptual comparison.与年龄相关的认知减缓中的任务特异性:词汇生成与概念比较。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001 Mar;56(2):P85-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.2.p85.
2
Why do picture naming latencies increase with age: general slowing, greater sensitivity to interference, or task-specific deficits?为什么图片命名潜伏期会随着年龄增长而增加:是普遍的反应变慢、对干扰更敏感,还是特定任务的缺陷?
Exp Aging Res. 1998 Jan-Feb;24(1):21-51. doi: 10.1080/036107398244346.
3
Differential contribution of cognitive and psychomotor functions to the age-related slowing of speech production.认知和心理运动功能对言语产生随年龄增长而减慢的差异贡献。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Sep;17(5):807-21. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711000828. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
4
Changes in naming and semantic abilities with aging from 50 to 90 years.50 岁至 90 岁衰老过程中命名和语义能力的变化。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013 Feb;19(2):119-26. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712001178. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
5
Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes.双重任务干扰中的年龄差异定位于反应生成过程。
Psychol Aging. 2001 Mar;16(1):47-54. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.47.
6
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Initial phase performance in a 30-s verbal fluency task as being reflective of aging effect.在一项30秒言语流畅性任务中的初始阶段表现反映了衰老效应。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Apr;15(4):496-500. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12284. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
8
Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude.受任务难度、目标大小和运动幅度影响的与年龄相关的运动学差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Jan;57(1):P54-64. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p54.
9
Age-related differences in working memory and force control under dual-task conditions.双任务条件下工作记忆和力量控制的年龄相关差异。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2006 Sep-Dec;13(3-4):366-84. doi: 10.1080/138255890969339.
10
Slowing in reading and picture naming: the effects of aging and developmental dyslexia.阅读和图片命名速度减慢:衰老与发育性阅读障碍的影响
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Oct;235(10):3093-3109. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5041-1. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.视力不会调节高级认知任务的效应量。
Exp Aging Res. 2016;42(3):221-63. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2016.1156964.