• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of myocardial fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of slotted-tube stents.

作者信息

Katritsis D G, Ioannidis J P, Korovesis S, Giazitzoglou E, Parissis J, Kalivas P, Webb-Peploe M M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Athens Euroclinic, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Mar;52(3):322-6; discussion 327. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1074.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.1074
PMID:11246245
Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been reported to provide similar results for assessment of coil stent deployment. Their relative value in slotted-tube stents has not been investigated. Fourteen patients subjected to coronary angioplasty and IVUS-guided elective stenting with a slotted-tube stent underwent IVUS assessment and FFR measurement following stent implantation at inflation pressures of 12 and 18 atm. FFR values (mean +/- SD) preangioplasty, postangioplasty, and poststenting at 12 atm and 18 atm, were 0.58 +/- 0.07, 0.83 +/- 0.05, 0.94 +/- 0.02, and 0.94 +/- 0.02, respectively. After inflation at 12 atm, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the concordance of IVUS and FFR measurements was 0.89 (P = 0.02). Six patients had either an abnormal IVUS (n = 2) or FFR < 0.94 (n = 1) or both abnormal IVUS and FFR < 0.94 (n = 3) after the first inflation and had a second inflation at 18 atm. The area under the ROC curve for the concordance between IVUS and FFR final measurements was 0.855 (P = 0.10). Perfect concordance between IVUS and FFR was seen only for FFR values less than 0.91 or larger than 0.94. Overall, IVUS and FFR have substantial concordance with respect to slotted-tube stent deployment. However, FFR values between 0.91 and 0.94 after inflation are difficult to interpret.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of myocardial fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of slotted-tube stents.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Mar;52(3):322-6; discussion 327. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1074.
2
Discrepancy between morphologic and functional criteria of optimal stent deployment using intravascular ultrasound and pressure derived myocardial fractional flow reserve.使用血管内超声和压力衍生心肌血流储备分数评估最佳支架植入的形态学标准与功能标准之间的差异。
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7(2):101-7. doi: 10.1080/14628840510039540.
3
Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment.分数血流储备与血管内超声引导用于优化支架置入的比较
Circulation. 2001 Oct 16;104(16):1917-22. doi: 10.1161/hc4101.097539.
4
A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and the Wallstent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL Study.
Am Heart J. 2001 Jun;141(6):971-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115301.
5
Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial.小冠状动脉疾病患者的解剖学和生理学评估:小冠状动脉支架植入前后的生理学和解剖学评估(PHANTOM)试验的最终结果
Am Heart J. 2007 Feb;153(2):296.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.036.
6
The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention.延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后联合冠状动脉内压力和血流速度测量的预后价值
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):291-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21331.
7
Usefulness of fractional flow reserve guidance for PCI in acute myocardial infarction.血流储备分数指导在急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用价值
J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Nov;14(11):657-62.
8
Is adjunctive balloon postdilatation necessary after coronary stent deployment? Final results from the POSTIT trial.冠状动脉支架置入术后是否需要辅助球囊后扩张?POSTIT试验的最终结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jun;59(2):184-92. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10474.
9
Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique.采用交叉技术行左主干冠状动脉分叉处支架置入术后分支血管的功能与形态学评估
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar 1;83(4):545-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25057. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
10
Recruitable collateral blood flow index predicts coronary instent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.可招募侧支血流指数可预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠状动脉支架再狭窄。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(15):1820-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm067. Epub 2007 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).支架置入术后的血流储备分数与冠状动脉造影对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的优化作用(TARGET-FFR)。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449.
2
A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.一项基于生理学的经皮冠状动脉介入优化策略的随机对照试验:TARGET FFR 研究的原理和设计。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 May;43(5):414-422. doi: 10.1002/clc.23342. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention.
基于冠状动脉压力测量的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗决策
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009 Nov;5(4):323-33. doi: 10.2174/157340309789317832.