• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于生理学的经皮冠状动脉介入优化策略的随机对照试验:TARGET FFR 研究的原理和设计。

A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

机构信息

West of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2020 May;43(5):414-422. doi: 10.1002/clc.23342. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1002/clc.23342
PMID:32037592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7244297/
Abstract

Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.90 confers an improved cardiac prognosis. There are currently limited data available to determine how often it is possible to improve an angiographically acceptable but physiologically suboptimal result. A physiology-guided optimization strategy can achieve a clinically meaningful increase in the proportion of patients achieving a final post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 compared to standard care. Following angiographically successful PCI procedures, 260 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either a physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (intervention group) or blinded post-PCI coronary physiology measurements (control group). Patients undergoing successful, standard-of-care PCI for either stable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who meet the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria will be eligible for randomization. The primary endpoint is defined as the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR result ≥0.90. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D-5L scores at 3 months and the rate of target vessel failure and its components (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned rehospitalization with target vessel revascularization) at 3 months and 1 year. 260 individual patients were successfully randomized between March 2018 and November 2019. Key baseline demographics of the study population are reported within. TARGET FFR is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial of an FFR-guided PCI optimization strategy. The study has completed recruitment and is now in clinical follow-up. It is anticipated that primary results will be presented in Autumn 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03259815. [Correction added on Apr 3 2020, after first online publication: Clinical Trials identifier added.].

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后血流储备分数(FFR)≥0.90 可改善心脏预后。目前,可用的数据有限,无法确定有多少次可能改善血管造影可接受但生理上不理想的结果。与标准治疗相比,生理学指导的优化策略可以使达到最终 PCI 后 FFR≥0.90 的患者比例有临床意义的增加。在血管造影成功的 PCI 手术后,260 名患者将被随机分为(1:1)接受生理学指导的增量优化策略(干预组)或接受盲法 PCI 后冠状动脉生理学测量(对照组)。符合研究纳入和排除标准、成功接受标准护理 PCI 治疗稳定型心绞痛或非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的患者有资格进行随机分组。主要终点定义为最终 PCI 后 FFR 结果≥0.90 的患者比例。次要终点包括西雅图心绞痛问卷和 EQ-5D-5L 评分在 3 个月时的基线变化,以及 3 个月和 1 年时靶血管失败及其组成部分(心脏死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓形成、计划外因靶血管血运重建而再次住院)的发生率。2018 年 3 月至 2019 年 11 月期间,成功对 260 名患者进行了随机分组。报告了研究人群的关键基线人口统计学数据。TARGET FFR 是一项由研究者发起的、前瞻性的、单中心、随机对照试验,旨在评估 FFR 指导的 PCI 优化策略。该研究已完成招募,目前正在进行临床随访。预计主要结果将于 2020 年秋季公布。临床试验注册号:NCT03259815。[2020 年 4 月 3 日更正后添加:临床试验标识符添加。]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1481/7244297/15b86e4bc388/CLC-43-414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1481/7244297/15b86e4bc388/CLC-43-414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1481/7244297/15b86e4bc388/CLC-43-414-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.一项基于生理学的经皮冠状动脉介入优化策略的随机对照试验:TARGET FFR 研究的原理和设计。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 May;43(5):414-422. doi: 10.1002/clc.23342. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization directed by high-definition intravascular ultrasound versus standard of care: Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized FFR-REACT trial.基于高分辨率血管内超声的 Fractional flow reserve 指导经皮冠状动脉介入优化治疗与标准治疗的对比:前瞻性随机 FFR-REACT 试验的原理和研究设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).支架置入术后的血流储备分数与冠状动脉造影对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的优化作用(TARGET-FFR)。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449.
4
Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支血管评估血流储备分数与血管造影术对比研究(FAME)3试验的原理与设计:多支冠状动脉疾病患者中血流储备分数引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):619-626.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
5
Outcomes After CABG Compared With FFR-Guided PCI in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与血流储备分数引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结局比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 14;18(7):838-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.01.434.
6
Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).光学相干断层成像术优化非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:多中心、随机 DOCTORS 研究的结果(光学相干断层成像术是否优化支架置入术的结果)。
Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):906-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024393. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Prespecified Analysis of the FRAME-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.血流储备分数指导治疗急性心肌梗死和多血管病变的成本效益:FRAME-AMI 随机临床试验的预设分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52427.
8
Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规测量分流量储备。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007428. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007428.
9
Three-Year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.基于 Murray 法的定量血流比和 OCT 或 FFR 指导在血管造影中度狭窄冠状动脉病变中的三年临床影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;17(5):e013191. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013191. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR): Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial.比较分数流动储备和血管内超声指导的干预策略对中间狭窄患者的临床结局的影响(FLAVOUR):一项随机临床试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiology-Based Revascularization: A New Approach to Plan and Optimize Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基于生理学的血运重建:规划和优化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的新方法。
JACC Asia. 2021 May 21;1(1):14-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.03.002. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).支架置入术后的血流储备分数与冠状动脉造影对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的优化作用(TARGET-FFR)。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449.
3
Optimal Prognostication of Patients with Coronary Stenoses in the Pre- and Post-PCI setting: Comments on TARGET FFR and DEFINE-FLOW Trials Presented at TCT Connect 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study.成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余缺血的盲法生理学评估:DEFINE PCI 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):1991-2001. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.054.
2
Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规测量分流量储备。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007428. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007428.
3
Influence of target vessel on prognostic relevance of fractional flow reserve after coronary stenting.
冠状动脉狭窄患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前后的最佳预后评估:对在2020年TCT Connect会议上发表的TARGET FFR和DEFINE-FLOW试验的评论
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Apr 27;16:e17. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2021.04. eCollection 2021 Feb.
支架置入术后靶血管对血流储备分数预后相关性的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 29;15(5):457-464. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00913.
4
Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial.冠状动脉生物可吸收支架的盲法结局和心绞痛评估:ABSORB IV 随机试验的 30 天和 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1530-1540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32283-9. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the Resting Full-cycle Ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study.新型冠状动脉狭窄严重程度非充血指数的验证:静息全周期比(VALIDATE RFR)研究。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Sep 20;14(7):806-814. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00342.
6
What are the causes of a suboptimal FFR after coronary stent deployment? Insights from a consecutive series using OCT imaging.经 OCT 成像分析,冠状动脉支架置入术后血流储备分数欠佳的原因有哪些?一项连续系列研究的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Dec 20;14(12):e1324-e1331. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00071.
7
Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后微循环阻力指数对非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的预后价值。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):1063-1074. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27529. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR: Are They All Equal?不同舒张期静息指数与 iFR 的比较:它们都一样吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3088-3096. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.066.
9
Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured Immediately After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.即刻药物洗脱支架置入后测量的血流储备分数的预后价值。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005233.
10
Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study.药物洗脱支架植入后即刻测量血流储备分数对冠心病患者临床事件的截断值和长期预测:来自 DKCRUSH VII 注册研究的 1 至 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 22;10(10):986-995. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Apr 26.