• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测重症监护病房患者的医院死亡率:人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型的比较

Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: a comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models.

作者信息

Clermont G, Angus D C, DiRusso S M, Griffin M, Linde-Zwirble W T

机构信息

Critical Care Medicine Division, the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and the Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):291-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-200102000-00012
PMID:11246308
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Logistic regression (LR), commonly used for hospital mortality prediction, has limitations. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been proposed as an alternative. We compared the performance of these approaches by using stepwise reductions in sample size.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Seven intensive care units (ICU) at one tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients were 1,647 ICU admissions for whom first-day Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III variables were collected.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We constructed LR and ANN models on a random set of 1,200 admissions (development set) and used the remaining 447 as the validation set. We repeated model construction on progressively smaller development sets (800, 400, and 200 admissions) and retested on the original validation set (n = 447). For each development set, we constructed models from two LR and two ANN architectures, organizing the independent variables differently. With the 1,200-admission development set, all models had good fit and discrimination on the validation set, where fit was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic (range, 10.6-15.3; p > or = .05) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) (range, 0.93 [95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.15] to 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.38]), and discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (range, 0.80-0.84). As development set sample size decreased, model performance on the validation set deteriorated rapidly, although the ANNs retained marginally better fit at 800 (best C statistic was 26.3 [p = .0009] and 13.1 [p = .11] for the LR and ANN models). Below 800, fit was poor with both approaches, with high C statistics (ranging from 22.8 [p <.004] to 633 [p <.0001]) and highly biased SMRs (seven of the eight models below 800 had SMRs of <0.85, with an upper confidence interval of <1). Discrimination ranged from 0.74 to 0.84 below 800.

CONCLUSIONS

When sample size is adequate, LR and ANN models have similar performance. However, development sets of < or = 800 were generally inadequate. This is concerning, given typical sample sizes used for individual ICU mortality prediction.

摘要

目的

常用于预测医院死亡率的逻辑回归(LR)存在局限性。有人提出将人工神经网络(ANN)作为一种替代方法。我们通过逐步减少样本量来比较这些方法的性能。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

一家三级医疗中心的七个重症监护病房(ICU)。

患者

1647例入住ICU的患者,收集了其首日急性生理学与慢性健康状况评价III变量。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

我们在一组随机抽取的1200例入院患者(开发集)上构建了LR和ANN模型,并将其余447例作为验证集。我们在逐渐变小的开发集(800例、400例和200例入院患者)上重复模型构建,并在原始验证集(n = 447)上重新测试。对于每个开发集,我们从两种LR和两种ANN架构构建模型,以不同方式组织自变量。对于1200例入院患者的开发集,所有模型在验证集上均具有良好的拟合度和区分度,拟合度通过Hosmer-Lemeshow C统计量(范围为10.6 - 1

相似文献

1
Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: a comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models.预测重症监护病房患者的医院死亡率:人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型的比较
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):291-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00012.
2
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
3
Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III predictions of hospital mortality in an independent database.在一个独立数据库中对急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III预测医院死亡率的评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1317-26. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00012.
4
Prediction of mortality in an Indian intensive care unit. Comparison between APACHE II and artificial neural networks.印度重症监护病房死亡率的预测。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)与人工神经网络的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):248-253. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2105-4. Epub 2004 Jan 15.
5
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
6
Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III).评估当代重症监护病房的预后:更新的死亡概率入院模型(MPM0-III)。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):827-35. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000257337.63529.9F.
7
Prediction of hospital mortality among critically ill patients in a single centre in Asia: comparison of artificial neural networks and logistic regression-based model.亚洲单一中心重症患者院内病死率预测:人工神经网络与基于逻辑回归模型的比较。
Hong Kong Med J. 2024 Apr;30(2):130-138. doi: 10.12809/hkmj2210235. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
8
Predictive accuracy of severity scoring system: a prospective cohort study using APACHE III in a Korean intensive care unit.严重程度评分系统的预测准确性:一项在韩国重症监护病房使用APACHE III的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00062-7.
9
Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.1993年至2003年,澳大利亚和新西兰成人重症监护患者双边数据库中的死亡率和住院时间结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):46-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.
10
Accuracy of a composite score using daily SAPS II and LOD scores for predicting hospital mortality in ICU patients hospitalized for more than 72 h.使用每日序贯器官衰竭评估(SAPS)II 评分和住院死亡概率(LOD)评分的综合评分预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)超过72小时患者医院死亡率的准确性。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s001340100961.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Model Using ML Techniques for Clinical Trial Design and Expedited Patient Onboarding Process.一种使用机器学习技术进行临床试验设计和加速患者入组流程的新型模型。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Jan 16;17:1-18. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S479603. eCollection 2025.
2
Contrastive Learning for Clinical Outcome Prediction with Partial Data Sources.利用部分数据源进行临床结果预测的对比学习
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2024 Jul;235:54156-54177.
3
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Mortality Risk in Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions: Retrospective Analysis.
用于预测复杂慢性病患者死亡风险的机器学习模型:回顾性分析
Online J Public Health Inform. 2023 Dec 28;15:e52782. doi: 10.2196/52782. eCollection 2023.
4
TERTIAN: Clinical Endpoint Prediction in ICU via Time-Aware Transformer-Based Hierarchical Attention Network.三代:通过基于时间感知的Transformer 分层注意力网络对 ICU 临床终点进行预测。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Dec 16;2022:4207940. doi: 10.1155/2022/4207940. eCollection 2022.
5
Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches.哪种模型在预测 ICU 生存率方面更具优势:人工智能与传统方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 26;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01903-9.
6
Establishment of ICU Mortality Risk Prediction Models with Machine Learning Algorithm Using MIMIC-IV Database.使用MIMIC-IV数据库通过机器学习算法建立重症监护病房死亡率风险预测模型
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;12(5):1068. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051068.
7
Artificial neural network approach for acute poisoning mortality prediction in emergency departments.急诊科急性中毒死亡率预测的人工神经网络方法
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;8(3):229-236. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.113. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
8
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Closed Loop Devices-Anesthesia Delivery.机器学习、深度学习和闭环设备-麻醉输送。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2021 Sep;39(3):565-581. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
9
Key Experimental Factors of Machine Learning-Based Identification of Surgery Cancellations.基于机器学习的手术取消识别的关键实验因素。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 20;2021:6247652. doi: 10.1155/2021/6247652. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparison of deep learning approaches to predict COVID-19 infection.预测新型冠状病毒肺炎感染的深度学习方法比较
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Nov;140:110120. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110120. Epub 2020 Jul 11.