Suppr超能文献

左旋多巴或多巴胺激动剂,或司来吉兰作为帕金森病的初始治疗。一项随机多中心研究。

Levodopa or dopamine agonists, or deprenyl as initial treatment for Parkinson's disease. A randomized multicenter study.

作者信息

Caraceni T, Musicco M

机构信息

Istituto Nazionale Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2001 Apr;7(2):107-114. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(00)00023-7.

Abstract

Objectives: levodopa improves the quality of life in parkinsonian patients, however long term response is compromised by the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in previously untreated patients assigned to receive levodopa, a dopamine agonist or deprenyl.Thirty-five neurological departments in Italian hospitals participated in this randomized open trial. Patients with Parkinson's disease, who required the initiation of an effective antiparkinsonian treatment, were randomly assigned to receive levodopa, dopamine agonists or deprenyl. The end-points were motor dyskinesias and motor fluctuations occurring in a median follow-up period of about 3years.After a median follow-up of 34months, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were less frequent in patients assigned to a dopamine agonist or deprenyl than in patients assigned to levodopa (relative risk [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.3-0.8, and RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, respectively), but dopamine agonists were less effective and less well tolerated than levodopa. The lower frequency of motor fluctuations in patients assigned to deprenyl was no longer statistically significant when prognostic predictors were considered in a multivariable analysis. Long-term mortality did not differ in the three arms of the study. Dopamine agonists and deprenyl can be considered as an alternative to levodopa for starting treatment in Parkinson's disease patients. However, on clinical grounds, only small advantages are expected over the traditional therapy initiation with levodopa.

摘要

目的

左旋多巴可改善帕金森病患者的生活质量,但长期疗效会因运动波动和异动症的出现而受到影响。本研究旨在比较初治患者中接受左旋多巴、多巴胺激动剂或司来吉兰后运动波动和异动症的发生情况。意大利医院的35个神经科参与了这项随机开放试验。需要开始有效抗帕金森病治疗的帕金森病患者被随机分配接受左旋多巴、多巴胺激动剂或司来吉兰。终点指标是在约3年的中位随访期内出现的运动异动症和运动波动。中位随访34个月后,接受多巴胺激动剂或司来吉兰治疗的患者出现运动波动和异动症的频率低于接受左旋多巴治疗的患者(相对风险[RR]分别为0.5,95%置信区间[95%CI]为0.3 - 0.8,以及RR = 0.6,95%CI为0.3 - 0.9),但多巴胺激动剂的疗效不如左旋多巴且耐受性较差。在多变量分析中考虑预后预测因素时,接受司来吉兰治疗的患者运动波动频率较低这一结果不再具有统计学意义。研究的三个组的长期死亡率没有差异。多巴胺激动剂和司来吉兰可被视为帕金森病患者起始治疗时替代左旋多巴的药物。然而,基于临床理由,相较于传统的左旋多巴起始治疗,预期只有微小的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验