JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1931-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1931.
Pramipexole and levodopa both ameliorate the motor symptoms of early Parkinson disease (PD), but no controlled studies have compared long-term outcomes after initiating dopaminergic therapy with pramipexole vs levodopa.
To compare the development of dopaminergic motor complications after initial treatment of early PD with pramipexole vs levodopa.
Multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Academic movement disorders clinics at 22 sites in the United States and Canada.
Three hundred one patients with early PD who required dopaminergic therapy to treat emerging disability, enrolled between October 1996 and August 1997.
Subjects were randomly assigned to receive pramipexole, 0.5 mg 3 times per day, with levodopa placebo (n = 151); or carbidopa/levodopa, 25/100 mg 3 times per day, with pramipexole placebo (n = 150). For patients with residual disability, the dosage was escalated during the first 10 weeks. From week 11 to month 23.5, investigators were permitted to add open-label levodopa to treat continuing or emerging disability.
Time to the first occurrence of any of 3 dopaminergic complications: wearing off, dyskinesias, or on-off motor fluctuations; changes in scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), assessed at baseline and follow-up evaluations; and, in a subgroup of 82 subjects evaluated at baseline and 23.5 months, ratio of specific to nondisplaceable striatal iodine 123 2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane (beta-CIT) uptake on single photon emission computed tomography imaging of the dopamine transporter.
Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in significantly less development of wearing off, dyskinesias, or on-off motor fluctuations (28%) compared with levodopa (51%) (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0. 30-0.66; P<.001). The mean improvement in total UPDRS score from baseline to 23.5 months was greater in the levodopa group than in the pramipexole group (9.2 vs 4.5 points; P<.001). Somnolence was more common in pramipexole-treated patients than in levodopa-treated patients (32.4% vs 17.3%; P =.003), and the difference was seen during the escalation phase of treatment. In the subgroup study, patients treated initially with pramipexole (n = 39) showed a mean (SD) decline of 20.0% (14.2%) in striatal beta-CIT uptake compared with a 24.8% (14.4%) decline in subjects treated initially with levodopa (n = 39; P =.15).
Fewer patients receiving initial treatment for PD with pramipexole developed dopaminergic motor complications than with levodopa therapy. Despite supplementation with open-label levodopa in both groups, the levodopa-treated group had a greater improvement in total UPDRS compared with the pramipexole group. JAMA. 2000;284:1931-1938.
普拉克索和左旋多巴均可改善早期帕金森病(PD)的运动症状,但尚无对照研究比较使用普拉克索与左旋多巴启动多巴胺能治疗后的长期结局。
比较普拉克索与左旋多巴初始治疗早期PD后多巴胺能运动并发症的发生情况。
多中心、平行组、双盲、随机对照试验。
美国和加拿大22个地点的学术性运动障碍诊所。
1996年10月至1997年8月期间纳入的301例早期PD患者,这些患者需要多巴胺能治疗以应对新出现的功能障碍。
受试者被随机分配接受普拉克索,每日3次,每次0.5mg,加用左旋多巴安慰剂(n = 151);或卡比多巴/左旋多巴,每日3次,每次25/100mg,加用普拉克索安慰剂(n = 150)。对于仍有功能障碍的患者,在最初10周内逐渐增加剂量。从第11周直至第23.5个月,允许研究者加用开放标签的左旋多巴以治疗持续或新出现的功能障碍。
首次出现以下3种多巴胺能并发症中任何一种的时间:疗效减退、异动症或开关现象;在基线和随访评估时统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)评分的变化;在基线和23.5个月时接受评估的82名受试者亚组中,单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像检测多巴胺转运体时,特异性与非置换性纹状体碘123 2-β-羧甲氧基-3-β-(4-碘苯基)托烷(β-CIT)摄取的比值。
与左旋多巴组(51%)相比,初始使用普拉克索治疗的患者出现疗效减退、异动症或开关现象的比例显著更低(28%)(风险比,0.45;95%置信区间[CI],0.30 - 0.66;P <.001)。从基线至23.5个月,左旋多巴组的UPDRS总分平均改善幅度大于普拉克索组(9.2分对4.5分;P <.001)。使用普拉克索治疗的患者比使用左旋多巴治疗的患者更常出现嗜睡(32.4%对17.3%;P =.003),且在治疗剂量增加阶段即可观察到差异。在亚组研究中,初始接受普拉克索治疗的患者(n = 39)纹状体β-CIT摄取平均(标准差)下降20.0%(14.2%),而初始接受左旋多巴治疗的患者(n = 39)下降24.8%(14.4%)(P =.15)。
与左旋多巴治疗相比,接受普拉克索初始治疗的PD患者发生多巴胺能运动并发症的患者更少。尽管两组均加用了开放标签的左旋多巴,但与普拉克索组相比,左旋多巴治疗组的UPDRS总分改善更大。《美国医学会杂志》。2000年;284:1931 - 1938。