• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症和内毒素血症的当前治疗方法。

Current treatment of sepsis and endotoxaemia.

作者信息

Periti P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.

出版信息

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Sep;1(6):1203-17. doi: 10.1517/14656566.1.6.1203.

DOI:10.1517/14656566.1.6.1203
PMID:11249488
Abstract

This article reviews the new criteria for selecting the proper antimicrobial agent and dosage regimen for standard treatment of severe sepsis, with the intention of preventing septic shock. After introducing new concepts on the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock, the authors analyse the parameters of beta-lactam antibacterial activity, the antibiotic-induced release of bacterial endotoxin and the interrelationships between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in the search for an optimum dosage regimen of antimicrobial mono- or polytherapy for severely ill septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The mortality rate resulting from severe bacterial sepsis, particularly that associated with shock, still approaches 50% in spite of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and optimum supportive care. Bacterial endotoxins that are part of the cell wall are one of the cofactors in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock and are often induced by antimicrobial chemotherapy, even if administered rationally. Not all antimicrobial agents are equally capable of inducing septic shock; this is dependent on their mechanism of action rather than on the causative pathogen species. The quantity of endotoxin released depends on the drug dose and whether filaments or spheroplast formation predominate. Some antibiotics, such as carbapenems, ceftriaxone, cefepime, glycopeptides, aminoglycosides and quinolones, do not have the propensity to provoke septic shock because their rapid bacterial activity induces mainly spheroplast or fragile spheroplast-like bacterial forms.

摘要

本文综述了为预防脓毒性休克而选择合适抗菌药物及剂量方案用于严重脓毒症标准治疗的新准则。在介绍了脓毒症和脓毒性休克发病机制的新概念后,作者分析了β-内酰胺类抗菌活性参数、抗生素诱导的细菌内毒素释放以及抗生素药代动力学和药效学之间的相互关系,以探寻针对入住重症监护病房的重症脓毒症患者的抗菌单药或联合治疗的最佳剂量方案。尽管进行了适当的抗菌治疗和最佳的支持治疗,但严重细菌性脓毒症导致的死亡率,尤其是与休克相关的死亡率,仍接近50%。作为细胞壁一部分的细菌内毒素是脓毒症和脓毒性休克发病机制中的辅助因素之一,即使合理使用抗菌化疗药物也常被诱导产生。并非所有抗菌药物都同样有引发脓毒性休克的能力;这取决于它们的作用机制而非致病病原体种类。内毒素释放量取决于药物剂量以及丝状菌或原生质球形成是否占主导。一些抗生素,如碳青霉烯类、头孢曲松、头孢吡肟、糖肽类、氨基糖苷类和喹诺酮类,没有引发脓毒性休克的倾向,因为它们快速的细菌活性主要诱导原生质球或类似脆弱原生质球的细菌形态。

相似文献

1
Current treatment of sepsis and endotoxaemia.脓毒症和内毒素血症的当前治疗方法。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Sep;1(6):1203-17. doi: 10.1517/14656566.1.6.1203.
2
New criteria for selecting the proper antimicrobial chemotherapy for severe sepsis and septic shock.为严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克选择合适抗菌化疗的新标准。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999 Jul;12(2):97-105. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00044-8.
3
Antibiotic-induced release of bacterial cell wall components in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock: a review.抗生素诱导的细菌细胞壁成分释放在脓毒症和脓毒性休克发病机制中的作用:综述
J Chemother. 1998 Dec;10(6):427-48. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.6.427.
4
Impact of appropriate antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock--a quality improvement study.适当的抗菌治疗对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的影响——一项质量改进研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e104475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104475. eCollection 2014.
5
Rules of anti-infection therapy for sepsis and septic shock.脓毒症和感染性休克抗感染治疗指南。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Mar 5;132(5):589-596. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000101.
6
Effective antibiotic treatment prescribed by emergency physicians in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock: where is the gap?急诊医生为入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者开具的有效抗生素治疗:差距在哪里?
J Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;41(6):573-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.10.024. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
7
Antimicrobial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the critically ill with severe sepsis and septic shock.严重脓毒症和感染性休克危重症患者的抗菌药药代动力学和药效学问题。
Crit Care Clin. 2011 Jan;27(1):19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.09.006.
8
De-escalation of antimicrobial treatment for adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock.成人脓毒症、严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克抗菌治疗的降阶梯治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD007934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007934.pub2.
9
Using the number needed to treat to assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as a determinant of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock.使用治疗所需人数来评估恰当的抗菌治疗,以此作为严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克预后的一个决定因素。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2342-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000516.
10
Does Early and Appropriate Antibiotic Administration Improve Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock?早期合理使用抗生素能否改善急诊科严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的死亡率?
J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):588-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Antithrombin III for critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.抗凝血酶III用于危重症患者:一项系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Apr;42(4):505-520. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4225-7. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
2
Antithrombin III for critically ill patients.用于重症患者的抗凝血酶III
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 8;2(2):CD005370. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005370.pub3.
3
Differences in microorganism growth on various dressings used to cover injection sites: inspection of the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli.
用于覆盖注射部位的各种敷料上微生物生长的差异:革兰氏阴性杆菌引起的导管相关血流感染风险检查
Surg Today. 2014 Dec;44(12):2339-44. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0935-z. Epub 2014 May 29.
4
Antithrombin III in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.重症患者的抗凝血酶III:系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
BMJ. 2007 Dec 15;335(7632):1248-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39398.682500.25. Epub 2007 Nov 23.
5
Mechanisms of bacterial pathogenicity.细菌致病性的机制。
Postgrad Med J. 2002 Apr;78(918):216-24. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.918.216.