Suppr超能文献

用于控制神经性疼痛的刺激方法。

Stimulation methods for neuropathic pain control.

作者信息

Stojanovic M P

机构信息

MGH Pain Center, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001 Apr;5(2):130-7. doi: 10.1007/s11916-001-0081-3.

Abstract

Neurostimulation methods for control of chronic neuropathic pain have recently gained in popularity. The reasons for this are multifactorial. As opposed to nerve ablation, these methods are minimally invasive and reversible. The improvements in hardware design simplified implantation techniques and prolonged equipment longevity. Stimulation trials have become less invasive, allowing patients to test its effects before final implantation. Finally, the scientific evidence has shown good outcomes of neurostimulation methods for chronic neuropathic pain control. Recent research efforts have revealed new potential mechanisms of action of neurostimulation. Whereas its action was widely explained by gate control theory in the past, it seems that neuromodulation acts also by modulation of neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Three neurostimulation methods are currently used in clinical practice: spinal cord stimulation (SCS), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). The SCS and PNS are excellent treatment choices for certain forms of neuropathic pain. The new indications for SCS are end-stage peripheral vascular disease and ischemic heart disease, whereas PNS is used for the treatment of occipital neuralgia and chronic pelvic pain. DBS is reserved for carefully selected patients in whom the other treatment modalities have failed. In a minority of patients the "tolerance" to neurostimulation develops after long-term use. Further research is needed to establish better outcome predictors to neurostimulation and possibly improve patient selection criteria.

摘要

用于控制慢性神经性疼痛的神经刺激方法近来越来越受欢迎。其原因是多方面的。与神经消融不同,这些方法具有微创性且可逆。硬件设计的改进简化了植入技术并延长了设备使用寿命。刺激试验的侵入性降低,使患者能够在最终植入前测试其效果。最后,科学证据表明神经刺激方法在控制慢性神经性疼痛方面有良好效果。最近的研究工作揭示了神经刺激新的潜在作用机制。过去其作用主要由闸门控制理论解释,而现在看来神经调节还通过调节中枢神经系统中的神经递质起作用。目前临床实践中使用三种神经刺激方法:脊髓刺激(SCS)、周围神经刺激(PNS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)。SCS和PNS是某些形式神经性疼痛的理想治疗选择。SCS的新适应症是终末期外周血管疾病和缺血性心脏病,而PNS用于治疗枕神经痛和慢性盆腔疼痛。DBS仅用于其他治疗方式均失败的经过精心挑选的患者。少数患者长期使用后会出现对神经刺激的“耐受性”。需要进一步研究以建立更好的神经刺激效果预测指标,并可能改进患者选择标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验