Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska Institute and Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden and Department of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, College of, Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Neuromodulation. 1999 Jul;2(3):150-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00150.x.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was an outgrowth of the well-known gate control theory presented by Melzack and Wall in 1965. Although the method has been used to treat chronic severe pain for more than three decades, very little was known about the physiological and biochemical mechanisms behind the beneficial effects until recently. We now know that SCS activates several different mechanisms to treat different types of pain such as neuropathic and ischemic. In general, these mechanisms seem most dependent on activation of only a few segments of the spinal cord. However, both animal studies and human observations have indicated that supraspinal circuits may contribute as well. In the treatment of neuropathic pain, intermittent SCS may give several hours of pain relief after cessation of the stimulation. This protracted effect indicates long-lasting modulation of neural activity involving changes in the local transmitter systems in the dorsal horns. In ischemic pain, animal experiments demonstrate that inhibition of afferent activity in the spinothalamic tracts, long-term suppression of sympathetic activity, and antidromic effects on peripheral reflex circuits may take part in the pain alleviation. Moderate SCS intensities seem to evoke sympathetic inhibition, but higher stimulation intensities may induce antidromically mediated release of vasoactive substances, eg, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), resulting in peripheral vasodilation. The anti-ischemic effect of SCS in angina pectoris due to intermittent coronary ischemia probably occurs because application of SCS appears to result in a redistribution of cardiac blood supply, as well as a decrease in tissue oxygen demand. Recent studies indicate that SCS modulates the activity of cardiac intrinsic neurons thereby restricting the arrythmogenic consequences of intermittent local coronary ischemia. The present state of knowledge is briefly reviewed and recent research directions outlined.
脊髓刺激 (SCS) 是由 Melzack 和 Wall 于 1965 年提出的著名门控理论的产物。尽管这种方法已经被用于治疗慢性严重疼痛超过三十年,但直到最近,人们对其有益效果背后的生理和生化机制才略知一二。我们现在知道,SCS 通过激活几种不同的机制来治疗不同类型的疼痛,如神经性和缺血性疼痛。一般来说,这些机制似乎主要依赖于脊髓的少数几个节段的激活。然而,动物研究和人类观察都表明,上行通路也可能起作用。在治疗神经性疼痛时,间歇性 SCS 停止刺激后可能会带来数小时的疼痛缓解。这种持久的效果表明,涉及背角局部递质系统变化的神经活动的长时间调制。在缺血性疼痛中,动物实验表明,脊髓丘脑束传入活动的抑制、交感神经活动的长期抑制以及外周反射回路的逆行作用可能参与了疼痛缓解。适度的 SCS 强度似乎会引起交感神经抑制,但更高的刺激强度可能会诱发逆行介导的血管活性物质释放,例如降钙素基因相关肽 (CGRP),导致外周血管扩张。SCS 在间歇性冠状动脉缺血引起的心绞痛中的抗缺血作用可能是因为 SCS 的应用似乎导致了心脏血液供应的重新分布,以及组织氧需求的减少。最近的研究表明,SCS 调节心脏固有神经元的活动,从而限制间歇性局部冠状动脉缺血的心律失常后果。简要回顾了目前的知识状况,并概述了最近的研究方向。