Tang-Martinez Z
Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Rd, 63121, St Louis, MO, USA
Behav Processes. 2001 Mar 13;53(1-2):21-40. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00148-0.
I re-examine the four most widely proposed mechanisms of kin discrimination among vertebrates and conclude that the current categorization of kin discrimination mechanisms has been counterproductive because it has a hindered a clear understanding of the basic mechanisms by which animals discriminate kin. I suggest that there likely is only one authentic mechanism of kin discrimination and that this mechanism is learning, particularly associative learning and habituation. Observed differences in the way animals discriminate between kin and non-kin are due only to the cues (e.g., individually-distinctive, family-distinctive, or self) that are used, and not to different mechanisms per se. I also consider whether kin discrimination is mediated by specially evolved kin recognition systems, defined as neural mechanisms that allow animals to directly classify conspecifics as either kin or non-kin. A preliminary analysis of vertebrate recognition systems suggests that specialized neural, endocrine, and developmental mechanisms specifically for recognizing kin have not evolved. Rather, kin discrimination results from an extension of other, non-specialized sensory and cognitive abilities of animals, and may be derived from other forms of social recognition, such as individual, group, or species recognition.
我重新审视了脊椎动物中最广泛提出的四种亲缘识别机制,并得出结论:目前对亲缘识别机制的分类产生了适得其反的效果,因为它阻碍了对动物识别亲属的基本机制的清晰理解。我认为可能只有一种真正的亲缘识别机制,即学习,特别是联想学习和习惯化。动物区分亲属和非亲属方式上观察到的差异仅仅是由于所使用的线索(例如个体独特、家族独特或自身线索),而不是由于机制本身不同。我还考虑了亲缘识别是否由专门进化的亲缘识别系统介导,该系统被定义为允许动物直接将同种个体分类为亲属或非亲属的神经机制。对脊椎动物识别系统的初步分析表明,专门用于识别亲属的神经、内分泌和发育机制尚未进化。相反,亲缘识别是动物其他非专门化的感官和认知能力的延伸结果,并且可能源自其他形式的社会识别,例如个体、群体或物种识别。