Skrbínc B, Babic A, Cúfer T, Us-Krásovec M
Department for Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cytopathology. 2001 Feb;12(1):15-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00297.x.
A potential cytological nuclear grading based on a semi-quantitative evaluation of three basic nuclear features, size of cell nuclei, anisonucleosis and the proportion of nucleoli-containing-nuclei, was tested on 74 Giemsa-stained fine needle aspiration of breast smears for its reliability in establishing the malignant potential of breast cancer. The prognostic impact of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction was also assessed. A good correlation between the three basic nuclear features, DNA-ploidy, S-phase fraction, cytological nuclear grade and histological grade, was shown. Using the cytological nuclear grade proposed, correct classification of cases between low histological grade (HG I) and high histological grade (HG II + HG III) was achieved in 79.73%. A statistically significant difference in 5-year survival rate was also observed between low malignancy grade and high malignancy grade breast cancer patients, regardless of the grading method used. DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction were not statistically significant in establishing the malignant potential of breast cancer.
基于对细胞核大小、核大小不均和含核仁细胞核比例这三个基本核特征的半定量评估,对74例经吉姆萨染色的乳腺涂片细针穿刺样本进行了一种潜在的细胞核分级检测,以评估其在确定乳腺癌恶性潜能方面的可靠性。同时还评估了DNA倍体和S期分数的预后影响。结果显示,这三个基本核特征、DNA倍体、S期分数、细胞核分级和组织学分级之间存在良好的相关性。采用所提出的细胞核分级方法,79.73%的病例在低组织学分级(HG I)和高组织学分级(HG II + HG III)之间得到了正确分类。无论采用何种分级方法,低恶性度和高恶性度乳腺癌患者的5年生存率也存在统计学上的显著差异。DNA倍体和S期分数在确定乳腺癌恶性潜能方面无统计学意义。