Roychoudhury S, Catrenich C E, McIntosh E J, McKeever H D, Makin K M, Koenigs P M, Ledoussal B
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Mason, Ohio 45040, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Apr;45(4):1115-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1115-1120.2001.
The activity of three new, 8-methoxy-nonfluorinated quinolones (NFQs) against multiple-drug-resistant staphylococci was investigated. First, using Staphylococcus aureus strains containing point mutations in the serine 84-80 hot spots of the target genes (gyrA and grlA), cell growth inhibition potencies of the NFQs as a result of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV inhibition were estimated and compared with those of known fluoroquinolones. The NFQs and clinafloxacin showed higher affinities toward both the targets than ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin and gatifloxacin. Furthermore, the ratio of the calculated affinity parameter for DNA gyrase to that for topoisomerase IV was lower in the case of the NFQs, clinafloxacin, and gatifloxacin than in the case of ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin. These results suggest that the former group of quinolones is better able to exploit both the targets. Next, using clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; n = 34) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; n = 24), the NFQs and clinafloxacin were shown to be more potent (MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC90] = 2 microg/ml for MRSA and 0.5 microg/ml for CoNS) than ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and gatifloxacin (MIC90 = 16 to >64 microg/ml for MRSA and 4 to >32 microg/ml for CoNS). Bactericidal kinetics experiments, using two MRSA isolates, showed that exposure to the NFQs at four times the MIC reduced the bacterial counts (measured in CFU per milliliter) by > or =3 log units in 2 to 4 h. Overall, the NFQs and clinafloxacin were less susceptible than the other quinolones to existing mechanisms of quinolone resistance in staphylococci.
研究了三种新型8-甲氧基-非氟化喹诺酮类(NFQ)药物对多重耐药葡萄球菌的活性。首先,使用在靶基因(gyrA和grlA)的丝氨酸84 - 80热点含有点突变的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株,估计由于DNA回旋酶和拓扑异构酶IV抑制导致的NFQ对细胞生长的抑制效力,并与已知氟喹诺酮类药物进行比较。与环丙沙星、曲伐沙星和加替沙星相比,NFQ和克林沙星对这两种靶标的亲和力更高。此外,NFQ、克林沙星和加替沙星的DNA回旋酶计算亲和力参数与拓扑异构酶IV的计算亲和力参数之比低于环丙沙星和曲伐沙星。这些结果表明,前一组喹诺酮类药物能够更好地作用于这两种靶标。接下来,使用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA;n = 34)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS;n = 24)的临床分离株,结果显示NFQ和克林沙星比环丙沙星、曲伐沙星和加替沙星更有效(对90%分离株产生抑制的MIC [MIC90]:MRSA为2μg/ml,CoNS为0.5μg/ml)(MRSA的MIC90 = 16至>64μg/ml,CoNS的MIC90 = 4至>32μg/ml)。使用两株MRSA分离株进行的杀菌动力学实验表明,以四倍MIC暴露于NFQ可在2至4小时内使细菌计数(以每毫升CFU计)降低≥3个对数单位。总体而言,与其他喹诺酮类药物相比,NFQ和克林沙星对葡萄球菌中现有的喹诺酮耐药机制不太敏感。