Suppr超能文献

在中性粒细胞减少性发热患者中,每日一次头孢曲松与每日三次头孢噻肟联合妥布霉素对比每日三次头孢噻肟联合妥布霉素的随机对照单中心研究。

Randomized controlled monocentric comparison of once daily ceftriaxone with tobramycin and cefotaxime three times daily with tobramycin in neutropenic fever.

作者信息

Cornely O A, Bethe U, Salzberger B, Franzen C, Hartmann P, Steinmetz T, Fätkenheuer G, Seifert H, Diehl V, Schrappe M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2001 Feb;80(2):103-8. doi: 10.1007/s002770000247.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, controlled monocentric trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once daily ceftriaxone 2 g plus tobramycin 5 mg/kg in comparison to cefotaxime 2 g t.i.d. plus tobramycin 5 mg/kg qd in the treatment of neutropenic fever. In cases of fever > or = 38.5 degrees C and a neutrophil count below 1000/microliter, patients with hematological malignancies were assigned to ceftriaxone or cefotaxime, each with tobramycin. The primary endpoint was defined as defervescence < 37.5 degrees C on day 4-6 followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary endpoints were overall response, defined as defervescence on day 25 and toxicity. There were 160 episodes of 114 patients included. Fever of unknown origin accounted for 79 episodes (51%), microbiologically defined infection for 36 (23%), clinically defined infection for 27 (17%), and both clinically and microbiologically defined infection for 14 episodes (9%). On an intent-to-treat basis 156 episodes could be evaluated for the primary endpoint. Ceftriaxone plus tobramycin and cefotaxime plus tobramycin resulted in a primary response in 46.9% and 45.3%, respectively. Overall response was achieved on study day 25 in 87.7% and 80%, respectively. No significant difference in toxicity was observed. Once-daily ceftriaxone plus tobramycin was not inferior to cefotaxime t.i.d. plus tobramycin qd in the empirical treatment of neutropenic fever.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照单中心试验,以评估每日一次头孢曲松2g加妥布霉素5mg/kg与头孢噻肟2g每日三次加妥布霉素5mg/kg每日一次治疗中性粒细胞减少性发热的疗效和安全性。对于发热≥38.5℃且中性粒细胞计数低于1000/微升的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,将其分配接受头孢曲松或头孢噻肟治疗,每种药物均联合妥布霉素。主要终点定义为在第4至6天体温降至<37.5℃,随后至少7天无发热。次要终点为总体反应,定义为在第25天体温降至正常以及毒性反应。纳入了114例患者的160次发热发作。不明原因发热占79次发作(51%),微生物学确诊感染占36次(23%),临床确诊感染占27次(17%),临床和微生物学均确诊感染占14次发作(9%)。基于意向性分析,156次发作可用于评估主要终点。头孢曲松加妥布霉素和头孢噻肟加妥布霉素的主要反应率分别为46.9%和45.3%。在研究第25天,总体反应率分别为87.7%和80%。未观察到毒性方面的显著差异。在中性粒细胞减少性发热的经验性治疗中,每日一次头孢曲松加妥布霉素并不劣于每日三次头孢噻肟加每日一次妥布霉素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验