• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次口服左氧氟沙星单药治疗与每日三次哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的比较:一项针对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机对照多中心试验。

Once-daily oral levofloxacin monotherapy versus piperacillin/tazobactam three times a day: a randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with febrile neutropenia.

作者信息

Cornely Oliver A, Wicke Thomas, Seifert Harald, Bethe Ullrich, Schwonzen Martin, Reichert Dietmar, Ullmann Andrew J, Karthaus Meinolf, Breuer Kai, Salzberger Bernd, Diehl Volker, Fätkenheuer Gerd

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2004 Jan;79(1):74-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02983537.

DOI:10.1007/BF02983537
PMID:14979482
Abstract

A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral monotherapy with 500 mg levofloxacin in comparison with 4.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam 3 times a day in patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. Low risk was defined by oral temperature > or = 38.5 degrees C on one occasion or > or = 38.0 degrees C twice within 24 hours and granulocytopenia < or = 500/microL for less than 10 days. The primary end point was defined as defervescence after 72 hours followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary end points were overall response, time to defervescence, survival on day 30, and toxicity. Thirty-four episodes were included. Fever of unknown origin accounted for 26 (76.5%) of the episodes, microbiologically defined infection for 5 (14.7%) of the episodes, and clinically defined infection for 3 (8.8%) of the episodes. On an intent-to-treat basis, all episodes were evaluable for the primary end point. Levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam were successful after 72 hours of treatment in 76.5% and 88.3% of the episodes. Overall response was achieved in 94.1% and 100% of the episodes, respectively. One inpatient in the oral treatment group died of septic shock without identification of a causative pathogen. A larger phase III trial is warranted to further evaluate the lack of inferiority of the oral monotherapy regimen versus standard intravenous therapy.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心试验,以评估每日一次口服500毫克左氧氟沙星单药治疗与每日3次静脉滴注4.5克哌拉西林/他唑巴坦相比,在低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的疗效和安全性。低风险定义为一次口腔温度≥38.5℃或24小时内两次≥38.0℃,且粒细胞减少≤500/μL持续时间少于10天。主要终点定义为72小时后退热,随后至少7天无发热。次要终点为总体反应、退热时间、第30天生存率和毒性。共纳入34例病例。不明原因发热占病例的26例(76.5%),微生物学定义的感染占5例(14.7%),临床定义的感染占3例(8.8%)。基于意向性分析,所有病例均可用于评估主要终点。治疗72小时后,左氧氟沙星和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的治疗成功率分别为76.5%和88.3%。总体反应分别在94.1%和100%的病例中实现。口服治疗组有1名住院患者死于感染性休克,未明确致病病原体。有必要进行一项更大规模的III期试验,以进一步评估口服单药治疗方案相对于标准静脉治疗方案是否不劣。

相似文献

1
Once-daily oral levofloxacin monotherapy versus piperacillin/tazobactam three times a day: a randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with febrile neutropenia.每日一次口服左氧氟沙星单药治疗与每日三次哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的比较:一项针对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机对照多中心试验。
Int J Hematol. 2004 Jan;79(1):74-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02983537.
2
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus tobramycin versus ceftazidime plus tobramycin as empiric therapy for fever in severely neutropenic patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合妥布霉素与头孢他啶联合妥布霉素作为严重中性粒细胞减少患者发热的经验性治疗
Support Care Cancer. 1999 Mar;7(2):89-94. doi: 10.1007/s005200050233.
3
[Treatment of febrile neutropenia episodes in children, with a piperacillin-tazobactam and netilmicin combination].[哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与奈替米星联合治疗儿童发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作]
Med Mal Infect. 2005 Jun;35(6):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2005.04.004.
4
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus cefepime as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients: a randomized comparison.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与头孢吡肟作为儿童癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性治疗的随机对照比较。
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006 Apr-May;23(3):177-86. doi: 10.1080/08880010500506370.
5
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenem therapy with and without amikacin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: results of an open randomized trial at a university hospital.哌拉西林他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物联合或不联合阿米卡星作为癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验性治疗:一项在大学医院进行的开放性随机试验结果。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):761-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq046. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
6
Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial.头孢吡肟联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星用于血液科发热性中性粒细胞减少患者初始抗生素治疗:一项开放、随机、多中心试验的结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Jul;50(1):79-88. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf087.
7
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热的经验性治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050184.
8
Piperacillin, beta-lactam inhibitor plus gentamicin as empirical therapy of a sequential regimen in febrile neutropenia of pediatric cancer patients.哌拉西林、β-内酰胺酶抑制剂加庆大霉素作为小儿癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症序贯治疗方案的经验性治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 2001 Jul;9(5):372-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200000225.
9
A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing piperacillin-tazobactam with and without amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,比较哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合或不联合阿米卡星作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性治疗的效果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 15;33(8):1295-301. doi: 10.1086/322646. Epub 2001 Sep 14.
10
Meropenem plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus netilmicin as empiric therapy for high-risk febrile neutropenia in children.美罗培南联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合奈替米星作为儿童高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性治疗
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Mar;21(2):115-23. doi: 10.1080/08880010490277321.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Management of Pediatric Patients with Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Using a Clinical Care Pathway in Egypt.在埃及采用临床护理路径成功管理低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症的儿科患者
Infect Chemother. 2025 Jun;57(2):288-295. doi: 10.3947/ic.2025.0009. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Sitafloxacin in Treating Low-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Lung Cancer.西他沙星治疗肺癌患者低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效与安全性
JMA J. 2022 Jul 15;5(3):334-340. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0227. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Efficacy of oral levofloxacin monotherapy against low-risk FN in patients with malignant lymphoma who received chemotherapy using the CHOP regimen.

本文引用的文献

1
Antimicrobial therapy of unexplained fever in neutropenic patients--guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO), Study Group Interventional Therapy of Unexplained Fever, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Supportivmassnahmen in der Onkologie (ASO) of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG-German Cancer Society).中性粒细胞减少患者不明原因发热的抗菌治疗——德国血液学和肿瘤学会(DGHO)传染病工作组(AGIHO)、不明原因发热介入治疗研究组、德国癌症协会(DKG-德国癌症协会)肿瘤学支持措施工作组(ASO)指南
Ann Hematol. 2003 Oct;82 Suppl 2:S105-17. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0764-4. Epub 2003 Sep 9.
2
Outpatient, sequential, parenteral-oral antibiotic therapy for lower risk febrile neutropenia in children with malignant disease: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial in Argentina.门诊序贯胃肠外-口服抗生素治疗恶性疾病患儿低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症:阿根廷一项单中心随机对照试验
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1775-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11251.
口服左氧氟沙星单药治疗接受 CHOP 方案化疗的恶性淋巴瘤低危 FN 患者的疗效。
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2020 Sep 25;60(3):73-77. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.20008. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
4
Once-daily, oral levofloxacin monotherapy for low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients: a pilot study in China.癌症患者低风险中性粒细胞减少性发热的每日一次口服左氧氟沙星单药治疗:中国的一项试点研究
Anticancer Drugs. 2015 Mar;26(3):359-62. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000187.
5
Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients.癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的口服与静脉抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 9;2013(10):CD003992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003992.pub3.
6
Empirical therapy with ceftazidime combined with levofloxacin or once-daily amikacin for febrile neutropenia in patients with neoplasia: a prospective comparative study.经验性治疗使用头孢他啶联合左氧氟沙星或阿米卡星每日 1 次治疗肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少伴发热:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;31(7):1389-98. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1454-0. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
7
Piperacillin-tazobactam in pediatric cancer patients younger than 25 months: a retrospective multicenter survey.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在25个月以下儿童癌症患者中的应用:一项回顾性多中心调查。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Nov;26(11):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0382-5.
3
Once-daily, high-dose levofloxacin versus ticarcillin-clavulanate alone or followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate for complicated skin and skin-structure infections: a randomized, open-label trial.每日一次大剂量左氧氟沙星与单独使用替卡西林-克拉维酸或之后使用阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的随机开放标签试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):381-9. doi: 10.1086/341026. Epub 2002 Jul 19.
4
Comparative in vitro activity of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against bacterial isolates from neutropenic patients.左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星对中性粒细胞减少患者分离菌的体外活性比较
Chemotherapy. 2002 Jul;48(3):134-7. doi: 10.1159/000064918.
5
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of beta-hemolytic and viridans group streptococci: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2000).β溶血性链球菌和草绿色链球菌的抗菌药敏模式:SENTRY抗菌监测计划(1997 - 2000年)报告
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Jun;43(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00374-7.
6
Empirical oral antibiotic therapy for low risk febrile cancer patients with neutropenia.
Cancer Invest. 2002;20(3):420-33. doi: 10.1081/cnv-120001186.
7
Risk assessment and risk-based therapeutic strategies in febrile neutropenia.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug;14(4):415-22. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200108000-00003.
8
2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer.2002年癌症中性粒细胞减少患者抗菌药物使用指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 15;34(6):730-51. doi: 10.1086/339215. Epub 2002 Feb 13.
9
A randomized monocentric trial in febrile neutropenic patients: ceftriaxone and gentamicin vs cefepime and gentamicin.
Ann Hematol. 2002 Jan;81(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00277-001-0392-9. Epub 2001 Dec 14.
10
Empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with mucositis: challenge of risk-based therapy.发热性中性粒细胞减少伴口腔炎患者的经验性治疗:基于风险治疗的挑战
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7 Suppl 4:47-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00058.x.