Suppr超能文献

每日一次口服左氧氟沙星单药治疗与每日三次哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的比较:一项针对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机对照多中心试验。

Once-daily oral levofloxacin monotherapy versus piperacillin/tazobactam three times a day: a randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with febrile neutropenia.

作者信息

Cornely Oliver A, Wicke Thomas, Seifert Harald, Bethe Ullrich, Schwonzen Martin, Reichert Dietmar, Ullmann Andrew J, Karthaus Meinolf, Breuer Kai, Salzberger Bernd, Diehl Volker, Fätkenheuer Gerd

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2004 Jan;79(1):74-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02983537.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral monotherapy with 500 mg levofloxacin in comparison with 4.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam 3 times a day in patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. Low risk was defined by oral temperature > or = 38.5 degrees C on one occasion or > or = 38.0 degrees C twice within 24 hours and granulocytopenia < or = 500/microL for less than 10 days. The primary end point was defined as defervescence after 72 hours followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary end points were overall response, time to defervescence, survival on day 30, and toxicity. Thirty-four episodes were included. Fever of unknown origin accounted for 26 (76.5%) of the episodes, microbiologically defined infection for 5 (14.7%) of the episodes, and clinically defined infection for 3 (8.8%) of the episodes. On an intent-to-treat basis, all episodes were evaluable for the primary end point. Levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam were successful after 72 hours of treatment in 76.5% and 88.3% of the episodes. Overall response was achieved in 94.1% and 100% of the episodes, respectively. One inpatient in the oral treatment group died of septic shock without identification of a causative pathogen. A larger phase III trial is warranted to further evaluate the lack of inferiority of the oral monotherapy regimen versus standard intravenous therapy.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心试验,以评估每日一次口服500毫克左氧氟沙星单药治疗与每日3次静脉滴注4.5克哌拉西林/他唑巴坦相比,在低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的疗效和安全性。低风险定义为一次口腔温度≥38.5℃或24小时内两次≥38.0℃,且粒细胞减少≤500/μL持续时间少于10天。主要终点定义为72小时后退热,随后至少7天无发热。次要终点为总体反应、退热时间、第30天生存率和毒性。共纳入34例病例。不明原因发热占病例的26例(76.5%),微生物学定义的感染占5例(14.7%),临床定义的感染占3例(8.8%)。基于意向性分析,所有病例均可用于评估主要终点。治疗72小时后,左氧氟沙星和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的治疗成功率分别为76.5%和88.3%。总体反应分别在94.1%和100%的病例中实现。口服治疗组有1名住院患者死于感染性休克,未明确致病病原体。有必要进行一项更大规模的III期试验,以进一步评估口服单药治疗方案相对于标准静脉治疗方案是否不劣。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验