• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将患者从品牌名氯氮平转换为通用名氯氮平。

Converting patients from brand-name clozapine to generic clozapine.

作者信息

Sajbel T A, Carter G W, Wiley R B

机构信息

Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo, 81003-1411, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2001 Mar;35(3):281-4. doi: 10.1345/aph.10183.

DOI:10.1345/aph.10183
PMID:11261523
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and dosage requirements when patients taking brand-name clozapine (Clozaril, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) are converted to generic clozapine (Zenith Goldline).

METHODS

In November 1999, patients at Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo taking Clozaril were changed to generic clozapine. Seventeen patients had been prescribed Clozaril for three years and were included in the study. Drug dosage, white blood cell (WBC) count values, and adverse drug reaction reports were compared. Data regarding patients on the brand-name product were evaluated retrospectively for the months of November, December, January, and February during the years 1996/1997, 1997/1998, and 1998/1999. These data were compared with those from the same patients after switching to generic clozapine for the same months in 1999/2000. A one-year comparison of brand-name (1998/1999) with generic drug (1999/2000) was also performed. Statistical analysis included a standard test comparing WBC values and a Brown-Forsythe test for comparing dosages.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the values obtained for the brand-name and generic products. WBC counts for the three-year data resulted in a p value of 0.9992. There was no difference when comparing the samples one year prior to switching and after the switch (p = 0.9991). There was no difference in dosages at three years or one year (p = 0.9999 and p = 0.9993, respectively). No adverse events were noted with the generic product.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences were found between the brand-name and generic clozapine groups with regard to WBC count, dosage, and adverse events. The conversion to the generic product is projected to save the pharmacy $90,000 annually.

摘要

目的

评估服用品牌氯氮平(可致律,诺华制药公司)的患者转换为通用型氯氮平(天顶金线)时的安全性和剂量要求。

方法

1999年11月,普韦布洛市科罗拉多心理健康研究所服用可致律的患者改用通用型氯氮平。17名患者已服用可致律三年,被纳入研究。比较了药物剂量、白细胞(WBC)计数和药物不良反应报告。回顾性评估了1996/1997年、1997/1998年和1998/1999年11月、12月、1月和2月服用品牌产品患者的数据。将这些数据与同一患者在1999/2000年相同月份改用通用型氯氮平后的数据进行比较。还对1998/1999年品牌药与1999/2000年通用型药物进行了为期一年的比较。统计分析包括比较白细胞值的标准检验和比较剂量的布朗-福赛斯检验。

结果

品牌药和通用型产品获得的值之间没有差异。三年数据的白细胞计数p值为0.9992。比较换药前一年和换药后一年的样本时没有差异(p = 0.9991)。三年或一年时的剂量没有差异(分别为p = 0.9999和p = 0.9993)。通用型产品未发现不良事件。

结论

品牌氯氮平组和通用型氯氮平组在白细胞计数、剂量和不良事件方面未发现差异。预计改用通用型产品每年可为药房节省90,000美元。

相似文献

1
Converting patients from brand-name clozapine to generic clozapine.将患者从品牌名氯氮平转换为通用名氯氮平。
Ann Pharmacother. 2001 Mar;35(3):281-4. doi: 10.1345/aph.10183.
2
Converting from brand-name to generic clozapine: a review of effectiveness and tolerability data.从品牌名药物氯氮平转换为通用名药物:有效性和耐受性数据的综述。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Jan 1;67(1):27-37. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080595.
3
Generic clozapine: a cost-saving alternative to brand name clozapine?通用型氯氮平:一种比品牌名氯氮平更具成本效益的替代选择?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(1):1-11. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321010-00001.
4
Generic replacement of clozapine: a simple decision model from a Canadian perspective.氯氮平的通用替代:从加拿大视角看的一个简单决策模型
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Apr;20(4):453-9. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003250.
5
Clinical effects of a randomized switch of patients from clozaril to generic clozapine.患者从氯氮平随机转换为氯氮平仿制药的临床效果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 5:14-7; discussion 23-4.
6
Evaluation of an interchangeability switch in patients treated with clozapine: A retrospective review.氯氮平治疗患者中互换性转换的评估:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;67(7):1047-54. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0706.
7
Evaluation of bioequivalence between generic and brand-name clozapine in Chinese schizophrenic patients: A randomized, two-period, crossover study.评价国产与原研氯氮平在中国精神分裂症患者中的生物等效性:一项随机、两周期、交叉研究。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;59(8):578-584. doi: 10.5414/CP203864.
8
Case reports of the reemergence of psychotic symptoms after conversion from brand-name clozapine to a generic formulation.从品牌名氯氮平转换为通用制剂后精神病性症状再次出现的病例报告。
Clin Ther. 2001 Oct;23(10):1720-31. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80139-9.
9
Does therapeutic equivalence follow bioequivalence? A randomized trial to assess clinical effects after switching from Clozaril to generic clozapine (gen-clozapine).从氯氮平到仿制药氯氮平(gen-clozapine)转换后的临床疗效评估:一项随机试验表明治疗等效性是否遵循生物等效性。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May;50(5):531-5. doi: 10.1177/0091270009347871. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
10
The bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy of generic versus brand-name psychoactive drugs.通用型与品牌型精神活性药物的生物等效性及治疗效果。
Clin Ther. 2003 Jun;25(6):1578-92. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80157-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Generic Substitution on Health and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.仿制药替代对健康和经济结果的影响:一项系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0147-0.
2
Rational use of generic psychotropic drugs.合理使用非专利精神药物。
CNS Drugs. 2013 May;27(5):353-65. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0045-2.
3
Switching from brand-name to generic psychotropic medications: a literature review.从品牌名药物转换为通用精神类药物:文献综述。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2011 Dec;17(6):750-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00210.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
4
Clinical equivalence of generic clozapine.通用型氯氮平的临床等效性。
Community Ment Health J. 2005 Aug;41(4):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-5981-y.
5
The AGNP-TDM Expert Group Consensus Guidelines: focus on therapeutic monitoring of antidepressants.AGNP-TDM专家小组共识指南:聚焦于抗抑郁药的治疗监测
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2005;7(3):231-47. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2005.7.3/pbaumann.
6
Generic clozapine: a cost-saving alternative to brand name clozapine?通用型氯氮平:一种比品牌名氯氮平更具成本效益的替代选择?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(1):1-11. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321010-00001.
7
Advances in atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: new formulations and new agents.用于治疗精神分裂症的非典型抗精神病药物进展:新剂型与新药物
CNS Drugs. 2002;16(4):249-61. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216040-00004.