Rosenberg R E, Abel R L, Drake M D, Fox D J, Ignatz A K, Kwiat D M, Schaal K M, Virkler P R
Department of Chemistry, SUNY, College at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454, USA. bob.rosenberg@.unh.edu
J Org Chem. 2001 Mar 9;66(5):1694-700. doi: 10.1021/jo0011787.
To better understand electronic effects on the diastereoselectivity of nucleophilic additions to the carbonyl group, a series of 2-X-4-tert-butylcyclohexanones (X = H, CH(3), OCH(3), F, Cl, Br) were reacted with LiAlH(4). Reduction of ketones with equatorial substituents yields increasing amounts of axial alcohol in the series for X [H < CH(3) < Br < Cl < F << OCH(3)]. These data cannot be explained by steric or chelation effects or by the theories of Felkin-Anh or Cieplak. Instead, an electrostatic argument is introduced: due to repulsion between the nucleophile and the X group, axial approach becomes energetically less favorable with an increase in the component of the dipole moment anti to the hydride approach trajectory. The ab initio calculated diastereoselectivities were close to the experimental values but did not reproduce the relative selectivity ordering among substituents. For reduction of ketones with axial substituents, increasing amounts of axial alcohol are seen in the series for X [Cl < Br < CH(3) < OCH(3) < H < F]. After some minor adjustments are made, this ordering is consistent with both the electrostatic model and Felkin-Anh theory. Cieplak theory cannot account for these data regardless of adjustments. Ab initio calculated diastereoselectivities were reasonably accurate for the nonpolar substituents but were poor for the polar substituents.
为了更好地理解电子效应对于羰基亲核加成反应非对映选择性的影响,一系列2-X-4-叔丁基环己酮(X = H、CH₃、OCH₃、F、Cl、Br)与氢化铝锂发生反应。对于具有平伏键取代基的酮类化合物,在X的系列中[H < CH₃ < Br < Cl < F << OCH₃],酮还原生成的轴向醇的量逐渐增加。这些数据无法用空间效应或螯合效应,也无法用费尔金-安理论或西普拉克理论来解释。相反,引入了一个静电学观点:由于亲核试剂与X基团之间的排斥作用,随着偶极矩中与氢化物进攻轨迹相反的分量增加,轴向进攻在能量上变得更不利。从头算计算得到的非对映选择性接近实验值,但没有重现取代基之间的相对选择性顺序。对于具有直立键取代基的酮类化合物的还原反应,在X的系列中[Cl < Br < CH₃ < OCH₃ < H < F],观察到轴向醇的量逐渐增加。经过一些微调后,这个顺序与静电模型和费尔金-安理论都一致。无论如何调整,西普拉克理论都无法解释这些数据。从头算计算得到的非对映选择性对于非极性取代基相当准确,但对于极性取代基则较差。