• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一勺糖……:利用经济激励措施提高结核病治疗的依从性

A spoonful of sugar...: improving adherence to tuberculosis treatment using financial incentives.

作者信息

Bock N N, Sales R M, Rogers T, DeVoe B

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.

出版信息

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Jan;5(1):96-8.

PMID:11263524
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether incentives increase adherence to directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB) treatment.

METHODS

The TB program gave a five-dollar grocery coupon for each DOT appointment kept to 55 patients who had missed at least 25% of DOT doses over a 4-week period. Treatment completion rates were compared with an historic control group of 52 patients who began treatment a year earlier, who would have been eligible for incentives but did not receive them.

RESULTS

Incentive program patients were more likely than control patients to complete therapy within 32 weeks (OR 5.73, 95%CI 2.25-14.84) and 52 weeks (OR 7.29, 95%CI 2.45-22.73).

CONCLUSION

Patient incentives can increase adherence to DOT in TB programs.

摘要

目的

确定激励措施是否能提高结核病(TB)治疗中直接观察治疗(DOT)的依从性。

方法

结核病项目为55名在4周内错过至少25% DOT剂量的患者,每次按时接受DOT治疗发放一张5美元的食品杂货优惠券。将治疗完成率与一年前开始治疗的52名历史对照组患者进行比较,这些患者本有资格获得激励但未得到。

结果

与对照组患者相比,激励项目组患者在32周内(比值比5.73,95%可信区间2.25 - 14.84)和52周内(比值比7.29,95%可信区间2.45 - 22.73)完成治疗的可能性更大。

结论

患者激励措施可提高结核病项目中DOT的依从性。

相似文献

1
A spoonful of sugar...: improving adherence to tuberculosis treatment using financial incentives.一勺糖……:利用经济激励措施提高结核病治疗的依从性
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Jan;5(1):96-8.
2
The effects of increasing incentives on adherence to tuberculosis directly observed therapy.增加激励措施对结核病直接观察治疗依从性的影响。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Sep;4(9):860-5.
3
Implementation of universal directly observed therapy at a New York City hospital and evaluation of an out-patient directly observed therapy program.纽约市一家医院实施普遍的直接观察治疗法及对门诊直接观察治疗项目的评估。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997 Oct;1(5):397-404.
4
Approaches to improving adherence to antituberculosis therapy--South Carolina and New York, 1986-1991.1986 - 1991年南卡罗来纳州和纽约州提高抗结核治疗依从性的方法
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993 Feb 5;42(4):74-5, 81.
5
Choosing incentives to stimulate tuberculosis treatment compliance in a poor county in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil.在巴西里约热内卢州的一个贫困县选择激励措施以促进结核病治疗依从性
Med Sci Monit. 2006 May;12(5):PH1-5.
6
DOT and timely treatment completion among Asian-born immigrant tuberculosis patients.亚洲出生的移民结核病患者的直接观察治疗及及时完成治疗情况。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Aug;9(8):884-9.
7
DOT or not? Direct observation of anti-tuberculosis treatment and patient outcomes, Kerala State, India.是否采用直接观察治疗法?印度喀拉拉邦抗结核治疗的直接观察与患者治疗结果
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 May;4(5):409-13.
8
Effectiveness of DOT for tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a prospective cohort study in Bangkok, Thailand.直接观察治疗(DOT)对结核病治疗结果的有效性:泰国曼谷的一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Jul;11(7):762-8.
9
Directly observed therapy (DOT) is not the entire answer: an operational cohort analysis.直接观察治疗(DOT)并非万全之策:一项操作性队列分析。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Aug;6(8):654-61.
10
Treatment interruptions and duration associated with default among new patients with tuberculosis in six regions of Russia.俄罗斯六个地区新结核病患者中与治疗中断及治疗期相关的治疗缺失情况
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 May;13(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of nutritional support to improve treatment adherence in patients with tuberculosis: a systematic review.营养支持对提高肺结核患者治疗依从性的效果:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2024 Sep 1;82(9):1216-1225. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad120.
2
Food to Overcome Outcomes Disparities: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Food Insecurity Interventions to Improve Cancer Outcomes.克服结果差异的食物:改善癌症结果的食物不安全干预的随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3603-3612. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02400. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
Perceptions and Acceptability of Digital Interventions Among Tuberculosis Patients in Cambodia: Qualitative Study of Video-Based Directly Observed Therapy.
柬埔寨肺结核患者对数字干预措施的认知与接受度:基于视频的直接观察治疗的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 27;22(7):e16856. doi: 10.2196/16856.
4
Patient support for tuberculosis patients in low-incidence countries: A systematic review.低发病国家中结核病患者的患者支持:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0205433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205433. eCollection 2018.
5
Adherence interventions and outcomes of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies.抗结核治疗的依从性干预措施及结局:试验和观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002595. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
7
Financial Incentives for Adherence to Hepatitis C Virus Clinical Care and Treatment: A Randomized Trial of Two Strategies.丙肝病毒临床护理与治疗依从性的经济激励措施:两种策略的随机试验
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 May 5;4(2):ofx095. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx095. eCollection 2017 Spring.
8
Beyond pills and tests: addressing the social determinants of tuberculosis.超越药物与检测:应对结核病的社会决定因素
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Dec;16(Suppl 6):s79-s91. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s79.
9
Contingency Management Interventions for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Hepatitis Control Among Individuals With Substance Use Disorders: A Systematized Review.针对物质使用障碍患者的艾滋病毒、结核病和肝炎控制的应急管理干预措施:一项系统评价
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jan;72:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
mHealth for Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence: A Framework to Guide Ethical Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation.移动医疗促进结核病治疗依从性:指导伦理规划、实施和评估的框架。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Jun 27;4(2):211-21. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00018. Print 2016 Jun 20.