Suppr超能文献

环氧化酶 -1 和环氧化酶 -2 的特异性抑制对正常黏膜及酸刺激后大鼠胃的影响。

Effects of specific inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 in the rat stomach with normal mucosa and after acid challenge.

作者信息

Gretzer B, Maricic N, Respondek M, Schuligoi R, Peskar B M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Clinical Medicine, Ruhr-University of Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 2001 Apr;132(7):1565-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703955.

Abstract
  1. Effects of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 inhibitor SC-560 and the COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib and DFU were investigated in the normal stomach and after acid challenge. 2. In healthy rats, neither SC-560 nor rofecoxib (20 mg kg(-1) each) given alone damaged the mucosa. Co-treatment with SC-560 and rofecoxib, however, induced severe lesions comparable to indomethacin (20 mg kg(-1)) whereas co-administration of SC-560 and DFU (20 mg kg(-1) each) had no comparable ulcerogenic effect 5 h after dosing. 3. SC-560 (20 mg kg(-1)) inhibited gastric 6-keto-prostaglandin (PG) F(1alpha) by 86+/-5% and platelet thromboxane (TX) B(2) formation by 89+/-4% comparable to indomethacin (20 mg kg(-1)). Rofecoxib (20 mg kg(-1)) did not inhibit gastric and platelet eicosanoids. 4. Intragastric HCl elevated mucosal mRNA levels of COX-2 but not COX-1. Dexamethasone (2 mg kg(-1)) prevented the up-regulation of COX-2. 5. After acid challenge, SC-560 (5 and 20 mg kg(-1)) induced dose-dependent injury. Rofecoxib (20 mg kg(-1)), DFU (5 mg kg(-1)) and dexamethasone (2 mg kg(-1)) given alone were not ulcerogenic but aggravated SC-560-induced damage. DFU augmented SC-560 damage 1 but not 5 h after administration whereas rofecoxib increased injury after both treatment periods suggesting different time courses. 6. Gastric injurious effects of rofecoxib and DFU correlated with inhibition of inflammatory PGE(2). 7. The findings show that in the normal stomach lesions only develop when both COX-1 and COX-2 are inhibited. In contrast, during acid challenge inhibition of COX-1 renders the mucosa more vulnerable suggesting an important role of COX-1 in mucosal defence in the presence of a potentially noxious agent. In this function COX-1 is supported by COX-2. In the face of pending injury, however, COX-2 cannot maintain mucosal integrity when the activity of COX-1 is suppressed.
摘要
  1. 研究了环氧化酶(COX)-1抑制剂SC-560以及COX-2抑制剂罗非昔布和DFU在正常胃及酸刺激后的作用。2. 在健康大鼠中,单独给予SC-560或罗非昔布(各20 mg·kg⁻¹)均未损伤胃黏膜。然而,SC-560与罗非昔布联合给药会诱发与吲哚美辛(20 mg·kg⁻¹)相当的严重损伤,而SC-560与DFU(各20 mg·kg⁻¹)联合给药在给药5小时后没有类似的致溃疡作用。3. SC-560(20 mg·kg⁻¹)抑制胃6-酮-前列腺素(PG)F₁α的生成达86±5%,抑制血小板血栓素(TX)B₂的生成达89±4%,与吲哚美辛(20 mg·kg⁻¹)相当。罗非昔布(20 mg·kg⁻¹)不抑制胃和血小板类花生酸的生成。4. 胃内盐酸可使COX-2的黏膜mRNA水平升高,但不影响COX-1。地塞米松(2 mg·kg⁻¹)可防止COX-2的上调。5. 酸刺激后,SC-560(5和20 mg·kg⁻¹)可引起剂量依赖性损伤。单独给予罗非昔布(20 mg·kg⁻¹)、DFU(5 mg·kg⁻¹)和地塞米松(2 mg·kg⁻¹)不会引起溃疡,但会加重SC-560诱导的损伤。DFU在给药1小时后增强了SC-560的损伤作用,但在5小时后没有,而罗非昔布在两个治疗时间段后均增加了损伤,提示不同的时间进程。6. 罗非昔布和DFU的胃损伤作用与炎症性前列腺素E₂的抑制有关。7. 研究结果表明,在正常胃中,只有当COX-1和COX-2均被抑制时才会发生损伤。相反,在酸刺激期间,COX-1的抑制使黏膜更易受损,提示在存在潜在有害物质的情况下,COX-1在黏膜防御中起重要作用。在这一功能中,COX-2起到支持作用。然而,面对即将发生的损伤,当COX-1的活性被抑制时,COX-2无法维持黏膜完整性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenomics of NSAID-Induced Upper Gastrointestinal Toxicity.非甾体抗炎药引起的上消化道毒性的药物基因组学
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 21;12:684162. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.684162. eCollection 2021.
2
NSAID-Gut Microbiota Interactions.非甾体抗炎药-肠道微生物群的相互作用
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 7;11:1153. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01153. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

7
Prostaglandins and bone: physiology and pathophysiology.前列腺素与骨骼:生理学与病理生理学
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Jul;7(4):419-21. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0230.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验