Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson T F
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):284-91. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113706.
The effectiveness of the seal obtained with carbon fiber posts and composite cores is still unclear. Both 3-step dental adhesives and self-etching adhesive primers have been suggested as adhesive systems.
This confocal microscopic study evaluated the microleakage of teeth endodontically treated and restored with fiber posts and composites with 3 adhesive systems.
A total of 72 human mandibular premolars were endodontically treated and divided into 6 groups of 12 teeth each. The first 3 groups were treated with an endodontic sealer containing zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) and restored with temporary filling materials containing ZOE. The last 3 groups were treated with ZOE-free materials. Post spaces were prepared in the root canals. The first group treated with ZOE-based materials was restored with fiber posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement and composite cores without adhesive. The other 2 groups of ZOE-treated teeth were restored with fiber posts cemented with All Bond 2 and Panavia 21 dental adhesives, respectively. The last 3 groups were restored with fiber posts cemented with All Bond 2, Panavia 21, and Panavia Fluoro cement, respectively. The teeth were loaded intermittently at 2 cycles per second in a moist environment and, after 300,000 cycles, immersed in a solution of Rhodamine B dye for 48 hours. A confocal microscope was used to observe the teeth. The ratio between the length of the interfaces observed and the length of the dye penetration was evaluated. Two teeth from each group acted as controls and were not subjected to dynamic loads.
All resin cement groups leaked significantly less than the group cemented with zinc phosphate cement. No statistically significant difference was found between the microleakage of teeth treated with ZOE-based and non-ZOE-based materials. Teeth restored with All Bond 2 dental adhesive leaked significantly less than those restored with Panavia cement.
The 3-step dental adhesive (All Bond 2) resulted in a better marginal seal than that obtained with the self-etching primers (Panavia 21 and Panavia F). The use of endodontic sealers and temporary filling materials containing ZOE had no detrimental effect on the marginal seal of carbon fiber post/composite resin core restorations.
使用碳纤维桩和复合树脂核所获得的封闭效果仍不明确。三步法牙科粘合剂和自酸蚀粘合剂底涂剂均被提议作为粘结系统。
本共聚焦显微镜研究评估了使用三种粘结系统的纤维桩和复合树脂修复经根管治疗的牙齿的微渗漏情况。
总共72颗人类下颌前磨牙经根管治疗后,分为6组,每组12颗牙齿。前三组使用含氧化锌丁香酚(ZOE)的根管封闭剂进行治疗,并用含ZOE的临时充填材料进行修复。后三组使用不含ZOE的材料进行治疗。在根管中制备桩道。第一组使用含ZOE材料治疗的牙齿,用磷酸锌粘固剂粘结纤维桩和不含粘结剂的复合树脂核进行修复。另外两组使用含ZOE材料治疗的牙齿,分别用All Bond 2和Panavia 21牙科粘合剂粘结纤维桩进行修复。最后三组分别用All Bond 2、Panavia 21和Panavia Fluoro粘固剂粘结纤维桩进行修复。牙齿在潮湿环境中以每秒2次循环的频率间歇加载,300,000次循环后,浸泡在罗丹明B染料溶液中48小时。使用共聚焦显微镜观察牙齿。评估观察到的界面长度与染料渗透长度之间的比例。每组两颗牙齿作为对照,不进行动态加载。
所有树脂粘结剂组的渗漏明显少于磷酸锌粘固剂粘结组。使用含ZOE材料和不含ZOE材料治疗的牙齿的微渗漏之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。用All Bond 2牙科粘合剂修复的牙齿的渗漏明显少于用Panavia粘固剂修复的牙齿。
三步法牙科粘合剂(All Bond 2)比自酸蚀底涂剂(Panavia 21和Panavia F)产生更好的边缘封闭效果。使用含ZOE的根管封闭剂和临时充填材料对碳纤维桩/复合树脂核修复体的边缘封闭没有不利影响。