两种不同树脂水门汀用于纤维桩粘结和核桩修复时微渗漏的比较评价：一项研究
A Comparative Evaluation of Micro-Leakage in Fiber Post Luted and Core Buildup Performed with Two Different Resin Cements: An Study.
作者信息
Kadam Vijay S, Huddar Dayanand, Badadare Mokshada, Jadhav Priyanka, Aher Sakshi, Botadra Ayushi
机构信息
Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
出版信息
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S937-S939. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_282_23. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the micro-leakages of fiber post luted and core buildup performed with ParaCore (Coltene) and LuxaCore (DMG) resin cement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-six single-rooted teeth were selected and treated with root canal treatment and fiber post cementation with two types of resin cement (LuxaCore and ParaCore). Samples were exposed to 500 cycles of thermocycling, immersed in 2% methylene dye and centrifuged and sectioned longitudinally, and checked under a stereomicroscope.
RESULTS
LuxaCore and ParaCore showed a mean of 0.39250 mm and 0.47500 mm micro-leakage, respectively.
CONCLUSION
There was a statistically non-significant difference seen with group 3 (LuxaCore) versus group 4 (ParaCore) ( > 0.05).
目的
比较使用帕拉科（科尔tene）和卢夏科（DMG）树脂水门汀进行纤维桩粘结和核桩修复后的微渗漏情况。
材料与方法
选取36颗单根牙，进行根管治疗并用两种树脂水门汀（卢夏科和帕拉科）进行纤维桩粘结。将样本进行500次热循环，浸入2%亚甲蓝染料中，离心并纵向切片，然后在体视显微镜下检查。
结果
卢夏科和帕拉科的微渗漏平均值分别为0.39250毫米和0.47500毫米。
结论
第3组（卢夏科）与第4组（帕拉科）之间存在统计学上无显著差异（>0.05）。
Zotero 插件