• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized controlled trials: the control group dilemma revisited.

作者信息

Hart A

机构信息

Statistics Group, Faculty of Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2001 Mar;9(1):40-4. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2000.0414.

DOI:10.1054/ctim.2000.0414
PMID:11264969
Abstract

In some randomised controlled trials the nature of the therapy means that subjects cannot or should not be blinded. Such studies need careful design. Particular attention needs to be given to the choice of control group and the nature of the informed consent obtained from subjects, because these affect the precise research question being addressed. A survey of published studies was carried to investigate how these issues had been tackled. The paper summarizes key findings from the survey. If the research question is about the specific effect of a therapy sometimes a good case can be made for a second control group which is 'attention-controlled'. There is a need for more detailed justifications of such design decisions in published studies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trials: the control group dilemma revisited.
Complement Ther Med. 2001 Mar;9(1):40-4. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2000.0414.
2
A critical approach to evidence provided through clinical trials.对通过临床试验提供的证据的批判性方法。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(36):36-8.
3
Methodological issues and complementary therapies: researching intangibles?方法学问题与补充疗法:研究无形之物?
Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2003 Aug;9(3):133-9. doi: 10.1016/S1353-6117(03)00042-8.
4
The context and meaning of placebos for complementary medicine.补充医学中安慰剂的背景与意义。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Dec;16(6):404-12. doi: 10.1159/000259371. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
5
Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research.在针灸研究背景下重新定义随机对照试验。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2006 May;12(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.10.001. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
6
[Ethical problems of the clinical placebo use].[临床使用安慰剂的伦理问题]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Sep 10;129(37):1939-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-831367.
7
Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.评估证据:泌尿外科文献中随机对照试验的统计方法
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1463-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
8
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题。
Health Technol Assess. 1998 Dec;2(15):i-vi, 1-132.
9
['Informed consent' and prerandomization].知情同意与随机分组前
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jul 1;144(27):1301-3.
10
Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials.在补充和替代医学随机对照试验中,较大的效应量与较高的质量评级相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 May;57(5):438-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study.参与和开展大型生育力随机试验(子宫内膜搔刮试验)的试验参与者和现场工作人员的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 16;11(9):e051698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051698.
2
Complementary or alternative medicine: the need for plausibility.补充医学或替代医学:合理性的必要性。
CMAJ. 2003 Jan 21;168(2):180-2.