Colaco R, Reay P, Beckett C, Aitchison T C, Mcfarlane P W
Department of Medical Cardiology, University of Glasgow.
J Electrocardiol. 2000;33 Suppl:239-44. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2000.20359.
The prevalence of electrocardiographic poor R-wave progression was estimated by reviewing all electrocardiograms recorded in Glasgow Royal Infirmary over a 2-week period. It was found to be higher in women (19% vs. 11%) than in men. To investigate one possible reason, the effect of chest electrode positioning in women was thereafter examined. Eighty four women were recruited to a study in which chest electrodes were placed strictly in adherence with recommendations of using the 4th and 5th intercostal spaces as references and also using the more widely adopted technique of placing electrodes V3 to V6 under the left breast. R wave amplitudes were compared in V3 to V6 from both sets of recordings. It was found that measurements recorded on the breast by electrode V3 have a significantly smaller R wave magnitude compared to corresponding measurements below the breast, the mean difference being 34 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 7 to 60) microvolts. For V5 and V6, the reverse is true with measurements taken on the breast being larger, on average, than those taken below the breast by 119 (95% CI of 87 to 152) and 134 (95% CI of 108 to 160) microvolts respectively. For V4, there was no significant difference. Seventeen women with poor R wave progression suggestive of old anterior myocardial infarction had clinical data examined from which it was determined that 11 had a history suggestive of myocardial infarction, ie, the positive predictive value was 65% (95% CI of 42% to 87%). It was concluded that positioning of electrodes beneath rather than on top of the breast was not responsible for the increased prevalence of poor R wave progression in women and that the criterion of isolated poor R wave progression was too nonspecific to be of clinical value.
通过回顾格拉斯哥皇家医院两周内记录的所有心电图,估算了心电图R波进展不良的患病率。结果发现,女性的患病率(19%对11%)高于男性。为了探究一个可能的原因,随后研究了胸部电极位置对女性的影响。招募了84名女性参与一项研究,在该研究中,严格按照使用第四和第五肋间间隙作为参考的建议放置胸部电极,同时也采用了更广泛使用的将电极V3至V6放置在左乳房下方的技术。比较了两组记录中V3至V6的R波振幅。结果发现,与乳房下方的相应测量值相比,电极V3在乳房上记录的测量值R波幅度明显更小,平均差异为34微伏(95%置信区间[CI]为7至60微伏)。对于V5和V6,情况相反,乳房上的测量值平均比乳房下方的测量值分别大119微伏(95%CI为87至152微伏)和134微伏(95%CI为108至160微伏)。对于V4,没有显著差异。对17名R波进展不良提示陈旧性前壁心肌梗死的女性的临床数据进行了检查,确定其中11名有心肌梗死病史,即阳性预测值为65%(95%CI为42%至87%)。得出的结论是,电极放置在乳房下方而非上方并非女性R波进展不良患病率增加的原因,且孤立的R波进展不良这一标准过于非特异性,不具有临床价值。