Hetzer R, Müller J H, Weng Y, Meyer R, Dandel M
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Berlin, Germany.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3 Suppl):S109-13; discussion S114-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02638-2.
Patients with end-stage heart failure placed on a cardiac assist device show at least some degree of improvement of cardiac function. In a subgroup of selected patients, some hearts recovered considerable function. In these patients the device was removed and cardiac transplantation was no longer necessary. We report our long-term experience with these weaned patients.
As of today, 512 cardiac assist devices of various types (Berlin Heart, Berlin, Germany; Novacor, World Heart, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; TCI, ThermoCardio Systems, Inc, Woburn, MA; DeBakey, Micromed Technology Inc, Houston, TX) were implanted in patients with end-stage heart failure in our institution. Of these, 95 patients belonged to a subgroup of patients with nonischemic, idiopathic, dilated cardiomyopathy who were implanted with a left ventricular support system (Novacor 84, TCI 10, Berlin Heart 1) between 1994 and 2000. All were routinely examined by echocardiography for improvement of cardiac function. The left ventricular diameter in diastole (LVIDd) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) served as the main parameters to assess changes in cardiac performance. Under the conditions of a running device, an LVIDd below 60 mm and an LVEF above 40% were the criteria to do further echocardiographic studies when the pump was turned off for up to 20 minutes.
Twenty-eight patients (26 men, 2 women; ages 18 to 64 yrs; history of heart failure, 1 to 17 yrs) fulfilled the criteria of improved cardiac performance and were weaned from the device. Since then, 16 patients have continued "normal" heart function with follow-up times ranging from 1 month to 5.5 years (group B). Three patients died of noncardiac causes (group C). Eight patients were transplanted from 1 to 17 months later and one died on the waiting list (group A). Statistically significant differences between groups A and B were calculated for the duration of heart failure (9 versus 2 years, p = 0.0002). Differences in LVIDd before removal of the device (57 versus 51 mm, p = 0.0420), LVEF after 2 months of unloading (30 versus 49%, p = 0.0300), and LVEF preexplantation (43 versus 52%, p = 0.0001) were significant. Overall, 17% of the cohort of 95 patients were weaned successfully.
Weaning from cardiac assist devices is feasible for selected patients; it saves donor hearts and is preferred to cardiac transplantation. However, as of today no reliable parameter predicts outcome after weaning and none determines the possibility of device removal before implantation in advance.
接受心脏辅助装置治疗的终末期心力衰竭患者的心脏功能至少会有一定程度的改善。在部分经过挑选的患者亚组中,一些心脏恢复了相当程度的功能。对于这些患者,移除了装置,不再需要进行心脏移植。我们报告了我们在这些成功撤机患者方面的长期经验。
截至目前,我们机构为终末期心力衰竭患者植入了512台不同类型的心脏辅助装置(德国柏林的柏林心脏;加拿大安大略省渥太华的世界心脏公司的诺瓦科尔;美国马萨诸塞州沃本的热控心血管系统公司的TCI;美国得克萨斯州休斯顿的微美克医疗技术公司的德巴基)。其中,95例患者属于非缺血性、特发性、扩张型心肌病患者亚组,他们在1994年至2000年间植入了左心室支持系统(诺瓦科尔84台、TCI 10台、柏林心脏1台)。所有患者均接受常规超声心动图检查以评估心脏功能改善情况。舒张末期左心室直径(LVIDd)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)作为评估心脏性能变化的主要参数。在装置运行的情况下,当泵关闭长达20分钟时,LVIDd低于60 mm且LVEF高于40%是进行进一步超声心动图研究的标准。
28例患者(26例男性,2例女性;年龄18至64岁;心力衰竭病史1至17年)符合心脏性能改善标准并成功撤机。从那时起,16例患者持续保持“正常”心脏功能,随访时间为1个月至5.5年(B组)。3例患者死于非心脏原因(C组)。8例患者在1至17个月后接受了心脏移植,1例在等待名单上死亡(A组)。计算得出A组和B组在心力衰竭持续时间(9年对2年,p = 0.0002)、装置移除前的LVIDd(57 mm对51 mm,p = 0.0420)、卸载2个月后的LVEF(30%对49%,p = 0.0300)以及植入前的LVEF(43%对52%,p = 0.0001)方面存在显著差异。总体而言,95例患者队列中有17%成功撤机。
对于部分经过挑选的患者,从心脏辅助装置撤机是可行的;这节省了供体心脏,比心脏移植更可取。然而,截至目前,尚无可靠参数可预测撤机后的结果,也没有参数能提前确定植入前移除装置的可能性。