• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰和威尔士产前检查次数的临床、医疗服务提供者及社会人口学决定因素

Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales.

作者信息

Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S, Maresh M

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2001 Apr;52(7):1123-34. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00212-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00212-4
PMID:11266054
Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure the independent effects of clinical factors and non-clinical factors, such as provider and sociodemographic characteristics, on the number of antenatal visits made by women in England and Wales. The study was based on a survey of the secondary case records of 20,771 women with singleton pregnancies who were delivered between 1 August 1994 and 31 July 1995. The women in the survey attended one of nine maternity units in Northern England and North Wales selected within those areas to reflect geographical variations, as well as variations in the size and teaching status of the institution. A multivariate Poisson regression model was developed to examine differences in the number of antenatal visits made by women with different clinical and non-clinical characteristics. After controlling for non-clinical factors, primiparous women identified as high risk at booking made 1.0% more visits than primiparous women identified as low risk at booking (p = 0.196). Multiparous women identified as high risk at booking made 3.5% more visits than their low risk counterparts (p<0.001). High risk-defining criteria during antenatal care led to a 0.3% weekly increase in the number of antenatal visits amongst primiparous women (p <0.001) and a 0.4% weekly increase in the number of antenatal visits amongst multiparous women (p < 0.001). Several notable results, not reported elsewhere in the literature, were revealed by the regression analyses. After all independent variables were controlled for, women who were booked into urban teaching hospitals made 10% fewer antenatal visits than the women who were booked into the urban non-teaching hospitals. Women of Pakistani origin made 9.1% fewer antenatal visits than women of white British origin. Similar results were revealed for women of Indian origin and women from other ethnic groups. Non-smokers made 6.0% more antenatal visits than smokers. The planned pattern of antenatal care, number of carers seen, gestation at first presentation and maternal age also had significant independent impacts on the number of antenatal visits. The study highlights the sizeable impact of non-clinical factors on the antenatal care delivery process and indicates ways in which variations in antenatal care might be reduced.

摘要

本研究的目的是衡量临床因素和非临床因素(如医疗服务提供者及社会人口学特征)对英格兰和威尔士女性产前检查次数的独立影响。该研究基于对1994年8月1日至1995年7月31日期间分娩的20,771名单胎妊娠女性的二次病例记录进行的调查。参与调查的女性来自英格兰北部和北威尔士的九个产科单位之一,这些单位是在上述地区内挑选出来的,以反映地理差异以及机构规模和教学状况的差异。构建了一个多元泊松回归模型,以研究具有不同临床和非临床特征的女性产前检查次数的差异。在控制了非临床因素后,孕早期被确定为高危的初产妇比孕早期被确定为低危的初产妇产前检查次数多1.0%(p = 0.196)。孕早期被确定为高危的经产妇比其低危同行产前检查次数多3.5%(p<0.001)。产前护理期间的高危定义标准导致初产妇产前检查次数每周增加0.3%(p <0.001),经产妇产前检查次数每周增加0.4%(p < 0.001)。回归分析揭示了一些文献中未在其他地方报道的显著结果。在控制了所有自变量后,在城市教学医院建档的女性比在城市非教学医院建档的女性产前检查次数少10%。巴基斯坦裔女性比英国白人女性产前检查次数少9.1%。印度裔女性和其他族裔女性也有类似结果。不吸烟者比吸烟者产前检查次数多6.0%。产前护理的计划模式、就诊护理人员数量、首次就诊时的孕周和产妇年龄也对产前检查次数有显著的独立影响。该研究突出了非临床因素对产前护理提供过程的重大影响,并指出了减少产前护理差异的方法。

相似文献

1
Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士产前检查次数的临床、医疗服务提供者及社会人口学决定因素
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Apr;52(7):1123-34. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00212-4.
2
Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士产前护理开始延迟的临床、医疗服务提供者及社会人口统计学预测因素。
BJOG. 2002 Mar;109(3):265-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00524.x.
3
The pattern of antenatal visits with emphasis on gestational age at booking in Riyadh Health Centres.利雅得健康中心以孕早期登记时的孕周为重点的产前检查模式。
J R Soc Health. 1994 Apr;114(2):62-6. doi: 10.1177/146642409411400203.
4
Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England.英格兰产前护理就诊情况中的社会和种族差异。
Public Health. 2008 Dec;122(12):1363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
5
Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jan 10;106(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00215-4.
6
Gestational age at antenatal booking in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) (revised edition).拉各斯大学教学医院(LUTH)产前登记时的孕周(修订版)。
Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;18(2):79-82. doi: 10.4314/nqjhm.v18i2.44987.
7
Gestational age at antenatal booking in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH).拉各斯大学教学医院(LUTH)产前登记时的孕周。
Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):162-4.
8
Randomised controlled trial of a reduced-visits programme of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe.津巴布韦哈拉雷减少产前检查次数方案的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 1996 Aug 10;348(9024):364-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01250-0.
9
Evaluating a policy of reduced consultant antenatal clinic visits for low risk multiparous women.评估一项针对低风险经产妇减少产前门诊会诊次数的政策。
Qual Health Care. 1993 Sep;2(3):152-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.3.152.
10
Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region.大都市地区产前检查次数的决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 1;10:527. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-527.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal Age and Inadequate Prenatal Care in West Virginia: A Project WATCH Study.西弗吉尼亚州的产妇年龄与产前护理不足:一项“关注项目”研究
J Appalach Health. 2024 Sep 1;6(1-2):21-37. doi: 10.13023/jah.0601.03. eCollection 2024.
2
Prenatal care and infant outcomes of teenage births: a Project WATCH study.青少年生育的产前护理和婴儿结局:一项 WATCH 项目研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 24;23(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05662-x.
3
Women who smoke during pregnancy are more likely to be referred to an obstetrician during pregnancy and birth: results from a cohort study.
孕期吸烟的女性在妊娠和分娩期间更有可能被转介给产科医生:一项队列研究的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04808-7.
4
Quality of antenatal care and its sociodemographic determinants: results of the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort, Brazil.产前保健质量及其社会人口学决定因素:2015 年佩洛塔斯出生队列研究,巴西。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07053-4.
5
Factors Associated with Numbers of Antenatal Care Visits in Rural Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚农村地区产前检查次数的相关因素
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jun 10;14:1403-1411. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S308802. eCollection 2021.
6
Antenatal care use and its determinants among migrant women during the first delivery: a nation-wide cross-sectional study in China.产前护理的使用及其在初产妇中的决定因素:中国一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2520-3.
7
Inequities in utilization of prenatal care: a population-based study in the Canadian province of Manitoba.产前保健利用方面的不平等:加拿大马尼托巴省的一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2061-1.
8
Maternal body mass index and access to antenatal care: a retrospective analysis of 619,502 births in England.母体体重指数与产前保健的获得:对英格兰 619502 例分娩的回顾性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1475-5.
9
Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?衡量欧洲的产前护理利用情况:孕期护理的内容和时间安排工具是否适用?
Int J Public Health. 2017 Jun;62(5):583-590. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0959-4. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study.感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的女性的产前护理充分性:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 29;15:514. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1842-y.