Suppr超能文献

机械能分析可识别残疾老年人步态中的代偿策略。

Mechanical energy analysis identifies compensatory strategies in disabled elders' gait.

作者信息

McGibbon C A, Krebs D E, Puniello M S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Biomotion Laboratory, and MGH Institute of Health Professions, 40 Parkman St., Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2001 Apr;34(4):481-90. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00220-7.

Abstract

Current concepts in disablement emphasize the importance of identifying mobility impairments in aging humans to enable timely intervention and, ultimately, prevent disability. Because mobility impairments are likely to result in compensatory movement strategies, recognizing and understanding those strategies may be critical in designing effective interventions for preventing disability. We sought to determine if mechanical energy methods are useful for identifying and understanding lower extremity compensatory movement strategies due to disabilities. Aleshinski's method was used to compute mechanical energy expenditure (MEE) and mechanical energy compensation (MEC) for the sagittal plane stance leg and low-back joints of healthy elders (HE) and disabled elders (DE) during preferred speed and paced (120 steps min(-1)) gait. DE subjects expended less ankle energy in late-stance and more low-back energy in mid-stance than did the HE subjects. When controlling for walking speed, the difference in ankle MEE disappeared, but mid-stance hip MEE was significantly higher for the DE subjects. Despite increased hip and low-back MEE, the DE subjects compensated hip and low-back muscles greater then HE subjects by increasing energy transferred into the pelvis, particularly when walking faster than their self-selected speed. Increased energy transfers into the pelvis during mid-stance may be a strategy used to assist in advancing and controlling the contralateral limb's swing phase. Increased trunk energy, however, may compromise dynamic stability and increase the risk of falling. We conclude that mechanical energy methods are useful for identifying and understanding compensatory movement strategies in elders with disabilities.

摘要

当前的残疾概念强调识别老年人行动能力障碍的重要性,以便能够及时进行干预,并最终预防残疾。由于行动能力障碍可能会导致代偿性运动策略,识别和理解这些策略对于设计有效的预防残疾干预措施可能至关重要。我们试图确定机械能方法是否有助于识别和理解因残疾导致的下肢代偿性运动策略。使用阿列辛斯基的方法来计算健康老年人(HE)和残疾老年人(DE)在偏好速度和定速(每分钟120步)步态期间矢状面站立腿和下背部关节的机械能消耗(MEE)和机械能补偿(MEC)。与HE受试者相比,DE受试者在站立后期消耗的踝关节能量更少,在站立中期消耗的下背部能量更多。在控制步行速度时,踝关节MEE的差异消失了,但DE受试者站立中期的髋关节MEE显著更高。尽管髋关节和下背部的MEE增加,但DE受试者通过增加转移到骨盆的能量,比HE受试者更大程度地补偿了髋关节和下背部肌肉,特别是当步行速度超过其自我选择速度时。站立中期向骨盆转移的能量增加可能是一种用于协助推进和控制对侧肢体摆动阶段的策略。然而,躯干能量增加可能会损害动态稳定性并增加跌倒风险。我们得出结论,机械能方法有助于识别和理解残疾老年人的代偿性运动策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验