Carr J A, Kralovich K A, Patton J H, Horst H M
Department of Trauma Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Am Surg. 2001 Mar;67(3):207-13; discussion 213-4.
Primary venorrhaphy for traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injury has been criticized because of the potential for stenosis, thrombosis, and embolism. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the morbidity and outcome of this method. Thirty-eight patients at our institution had traumatic injuries to the IVC between 1994 and 1999. Thirty (79%) were from firearms, five (13%) from stab wounds, and three (8%) from blunt trauma. Six patients died in the emergency department. The remaining 32 patients underwent exploratory celiotomy with 23 survivors and nine intraoperative deaths for a mortality rate of 28 per cent (nine of 32). Vascular control was achieved by manual compression in 44 per cent and by local clamping directly above and below the injury in 38 per cent. All repairs were by primary venorrhaphy, and no patient was treated with patch angioplasty or venous reconstruction. Three patients had caval ligation. Follow-up IVC imaging in 11 patients revealed that the IVC was patent in eight, narrowed in two, and thrombosed below the renal veins in one. One patient developed a pulmonary embolus. The vast majority of traumatic injuries to the IVC can be managed by direct compression or local clamping and primary venorrhaphy. Direct repairs are associated with a low thrombosis and embolic complication rate.
由于存在狭窄、血栓形成和栓塞的可能性,创伤性下腔静脉(IVC)损伤的一期静脉缝合术受到了批评。进行了一项回顾性研究以评估该方法的发病率和结果。1994年至1999年间,我们机构有38例患者发生了IVC创伤性损伤。其中30例(79%)由火器伤导致,5例(13%)由刺伤导致,3例(8%)由钝性创伤导致。6例患者在急诊科死亡。其余32例患者接受了剖腹探查术,23例存活,9例术中死亡,死亡率为28%(32例中的9例)。44%的患者通过手动压迫实现血管控制,38%的患者通过在损伤部位上方和下方直接局部钳夹实现血管控制。所有修复均采用一期静脉缝合术,没有患者接受补片血管成形术或静脉重建治疗。3例患者进行了腔静脉结扎。对11例患者的IVC进行随访成像显示,8例IVC通畅,2例狭窄,1例肾静脉以下血栓形成。1例患者发生了肺栓塞。绝大多数IVC创伤性损伤可通过直接压迫或局部钳夹及一期静脉缝合术进行处理。直接修复的血栓形成和栓塞并发症发生率较低。