Kemmeter P R, Hoedema R E, Foote J A, Scholten D J
Spectrum Health/Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, USA.
Am Surg. 2001 Mar;67(3):221-5; discussion 225-6.
Prompt identification of enteric injuries after blunt trauma remains problematic. With the increased utilization of nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma gastrointestinal disruptions may escape timely detection and repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate blunt enteric injuries requiring operative repair in adult patients and the association of concomitant hepatic and/or splenic injuries. Over a 10-year period (January 1990 through December 1999) 1648 patients suffered blunt liver, spleen, and/or enteric injuries, with 87 (5.3%) of these requiring operative repairs of the enteric injury. These patients had enteric injury only (EI) (60.9%; 53 of 87), concomitant enteric/splenic injury (ESI) (10.3%; 9 of 87), concomitant enteric/hepatic injury (EHI) (13.8%; 12 of 87), and enteric/hepatic/splenic injury (EHSI) 14.9% (13 of 87). A delay in treatment of >8 hours from presentation of EI compared with either EHI or ESI was not significantly different between the two groups. EHSI had exploratory laparotomy more expeditiously related to hemodynamic instability. Mortality rates were higher with EHI related to hemorrhagic shock and/or severe traumatic brain injury. Morbidity was not related to a delay in diagnosis until the period of delay was greater than 24 hours. The nonoperative management of blunt solid organ injury does not delay the detection and treatment of concomitant bowel injuries compared with isolated blunt enteric injuries. Occult enteric injury with solid organ injury has a low incidence and represents a continuing challenge to the clinical acumen of the trauma surgeon.
钝性创伤后肠道损伤的及时识别仍然存在问题。随着钝性腹部创伤非手术治疗的应用增加,胃肠道破裂可能无法得到及时检测和修复。本研究的目的是评估成年患者中需要手术修复的钝性肠道损伤以及合并肝和/或脾损伤的情况。在10年期间(1990年1月至1999年12月),1648例患者遭受钝性肝、脾和/或肠道损伤,其中87例(5.3%)需要对肠道损伤进行手术修复。这些患者仅患有肠道损伤(EI)(60.9%;87例中的53例)、合并肠道/脾损伤(ESI)(10.3%;87例中的9例)、合并肠道/肝损伤(EHI)(13.8%;87例中的12例)以及肠道/肝/脾损伤(EHSI)14.9%(87例中的13例)。EI患者与EHI或ESI患者相比,从就诊到治疗的延迟>8小时,两组之间无显著差异。EHSI因血流动力学不稳定而更快地进行了剖腹探查。EHI患者因失血性休克和/或严重创伤性脑损伤导致死亡率更高。直到延迟时间超过24小时,发病率才与诊断延迟相关。与单纯钝性肠道损伤相比,钝性实体器官损伤的非手术治疗不会延迟对合并肠损伤的检测和治疗。隐匿性肠道损伤合并实体器官损伤的发生率较低,对创伤外科医生的临床敏锐度仍构成持续挑战。