• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无需进行强制性盆腔检查即可提供激素避孕药:首个试点示范项目。

Provision of hormonal contraceptives without a mandatory pelvic examination: the first stop demonstration project.

作者信息

Harper C, Balistreri E, Boggess J, Leon K, Darney P

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):13-8.

PMID:11271540
Abstract

CONTEXT

First Stop, an 18-month demonstration project that operated in 1996-1997, was designed to offer low-income adult women in California hormonal contraceptives without requiring a pelvic examination.

METHODS

An evaluation was undertaken to assess the contraceptives adopted by First Stop clients, compare health risks of these women with risks among women using traditional family planning clinics and assess clients'satisfaction. Data on 2,065 First Stop clients and 1,507 women attending traditional clinics were collected through several self- and clinician-administered instruments, including questionnaires, a telephone survey and medical chart abstractions.

RESULTS

After the initial First Stop visit, 38% of women adopted a more effective method than they had used at last sex, 4 7% remained with the same method, 12% switched to a less-effective method and 3% accepted no method. Of clients who were referred for additional medical care, 73% followed through on their referrals. Compared with clients at traditional clinics, First Stop clients were less likely to have a regular source of health care, but more likely to have made a health care visit in the past year. Most First Stop clients valued the project's services; 76% said it was important to be able to receive pills or injections without a pelvic examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Programs that provide hormonal contraceptives without requiring a pelvic examination can expand low-income women's access to these methods and improve the chances that they will obtain other reproductive health services.

摘要

背景

“第一站”是一个在1996 - 1997年开展的为期18个月的示范项目,旨在为加利福尼亚州的低收入成年女性提供激素避孕措施,且无需进行盆腔检查。

方法

进行了一项评估,以评估“第一站”的客户采用的避孕措施,将这些女性的健康风险与使用传统计划生育诊所的女性的风险进行比较,并评估客户的满意度。通过几种自我管理和临床医生管理的工具收集了2065名“第一站”客户和1507名在传统诊所就诊的女性的数据,包括问卷、电话调查和病历摘要。

结果

在首次访问“第一站”后,38%的女性采用了比她们上次性行为时使用的更有效的方法,47%的女性保持使用相同的方法,12%的女性改用了效果较差的方法,3%的女性未采用任何方法。在被转介接受额外医疗护理的客户中,73%的人接受了转介。与传统诊所的客户相比,“第一站”的客户不太可能有固定的医疗保健来源,但在过去一年中更有可能去看过病。大多数“第一站”的客户重视该项目的服务;76%的人表示能够在不进行盆腔检查的情况下获得避孕药丸或注射剂很重要。

结论

提供无需盆腔检查的激素避孕措施的项目可以扩大低收入女性获得这些方法的机会,并提高她们获得其他生殖健康服务的可能性。

相似文献

1
Provision of hormonal contraceptives without a mandatory pelvic examination: the first stop demonstration project.无需进行强制性盆腔检查即可提供激素避孕药:首个试点示范项目。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):13-8.
2
Public or private providers? U.S. women's use of reproductive health services.公立还是私立医疗机构?美国女性对生殖健康服务的利用情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):4-12.
3
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
4
The availability and use of publicly funded family planning clinics: U.S. trends, 1994-2001.公共资助的计划生育诊所的可及性与使用情况:美国趋势,1994 - 2001年
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):206-15. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.206.04.
5
U.S. agencies providing publicly funded contraceptive services in 1999.1999年提供公共资金支持的避孕服务的美国机构。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002 Jan-Feb;34(1):15-24.
6
Who is using emergency contraception? Awareness and use of emergency contraception among California women and teens.谁在使用紧急避孕药?加利福尼亚州女性和青少年对紧急避孕药的认知与使用情况。
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.06.005.
7
Evaluation of a peer provider reproductive health service model for adolescents.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005 Jun;37(2):85-91. doi: 10.1363/psrh.37.085.05.
8
Family planning and life planning reproductive intentions among individuals seeking reproductive health care.寻求生殖健康护理的个人的计划生育和生活规划生育意愿。
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 May 15.
9
Pelvic exam prerequisite to hormonal contraceptives: unjustified infringement on constitutional rights, governmental coercion, and bad public policy.激素避孕药的盆腔检查前提条件:对宪法权利的不合理侵犯、政府强制行为及不良公共政策。
Harv Womens Law J. 2004 Spring;27:177-233.
10
The use of nurse practitioners for the provision of family planning services in Egypt.在埃及使用执业护士提供计划生育服务。
J Famil Health Train. 1982;1(2):11-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Kentucky pharmacists' perceptions regarding provision of hormonal contraception.肯塔基州药剂师对提供激素避孕的看法。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Nov-Dec;61(6):e42-e51. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.因担心亲密伴侣暴力史而推迟避孕就诊的女性的盆腔检查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1883-1889. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06334-8. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.
美国 15-20 岁青少年女孩和年轻女性中潜在不必要的双手骨盆检查和巴氏涂片检查的流行情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):274-280. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727.
4
Concern is not based on evidence.担忧并非基于证据。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Sep;62(9):712-3.
5
Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care adoption of the American College of Physicians guideline.常规盆腔检查筛查建议:加拿大预防保健工作组采用美国医师协会指南。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Mar;62(3):211-4.
6
Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists.美国妇产科医师常规双手骨盆检查:实践与信念。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):109.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.015. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
7
Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users.门诊与非处方口服避孕药使用者的生殖健康预防筛查。
Contraception. 2012 Oct;86(4):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.盆腔检查和口服激素避孕药的获取。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1257-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fb540f.
9
Why Iranian married women use withdrawal instead of oral contraceptives? A qualitative study from Iran.为什么伊朗已婚妇女选择体外排精而不是口服避孕药?来自伊朗的一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 28;10:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-289.