Suppr超能文献

对于临床局限性前列腺癌,近距离放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术及外照射放疗相比效果如何?

Is brachytherapy comparable with radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiation for clinically localized prostate cancer?

作者信息

Merrick G S, Butler W M, Lief J H, Dorsey A T

机构信息

Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, West Virginia 26033-6300, USA.

出版信息

Tech Urol. 2001 Mar;7(1):12-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to summarize the prostate brachytherapy literature and provide a comparative analysis of brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiation therapy outcomes for early-stage carcinoma of the prostate gland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Published literature on brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized carcinoma ofthe prostate gland was reviewed. In addition, MEDLINE searches were performed to ensure completeness of the knowledge base.

RESULTS

For patients with low-risk features, the biochemical results of prostate brachytherapy are as favorable as the most positive radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiation therapy series. In most studies, patients with intermediate- and high-risk disease have more durable biochemical outcomes when treated with brachytherapy (with or without external-beam radiation therapy). Long-term urinary morbidity is primarily restricted to patients with a history of transurethral resection. Significant bowel dysfunction is uncommon. Although erectile dysfunction occurs in approximately 50% of patients at 5 years, 80% respond favorably to sildenafil. Multiple postoperative dosimetric studies supported the ability of brachytherapists to adequately encompass the target volume. Compared with radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiation therapy, the total cost of prostate brachytherapy is 20% less.

CONCLUSIONS

With prostate-specific antigen-based follow-up as long as 10 years, the results of prostate brachytherapy for low-risk patients are as favorable as the most positive radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiation therapy series. In most reports, intermediate- and high-risk patients have more durable biochemical outcomes when managed by brachytherapy approach (with or without external-beam radiation therapy). Serious complications following brachytherapy are relatively rare.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在总结前列腺近距离放射治疗的文献,并对早期前列腺癌的近距离放射治疗、根治性前列腺切除术和外照射放疗的结果进行比较分析。

材料与方法

回顾了已发表的关于前列腺临床局限性癌的近距离放射治疗、根治性前列腺切除术和外照射放疗的文献。此外,还进行了医学文献数据库检索以确保知识库的完整性。

结果

对于低风险特征的患者,前列腺近距离放射治疗的生化结果与最积极的根治性前列腺切除术和外照射放疗系列一样良好。在大多数研究中,中高危疾病患者接受近距离放射治疗(联合或不联合外照射放疗)时生化结果更持久。长期泌尿系统发病率主要限于有经尿道切除术病史的患者。严重的肠道功能障碍并不常见。虽然约50%的患者在5年时出现勃起功能障碍,但80%的患者对西地那非反应良好。多项术后剂量学研究支持近距离放射治疗医生充分覆盖靶体积的能力。与根治性前列腺切除术和外照射放疗相比,前列腺近距离放射治疗的总成本低20%。

结论

在长达10年的基于前列腺特异性抗原的随访中,低风险患者的前列腺近距离放射治疗结果与最积极的根治性前列腺切除术和外照射放疗系列一样良好。在大多数报告中,中高危患者采用近距离放射治疗方法(联合或不联合外照射放疗)时生化结果更持久。近距离放射治疗后的严重并发症相对少见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验